[PATCH] mm: make minimum slab alignment a runtime property
Peter Collingbourne
pcc at google.com
Thu Apr 21 10:16:25 PDT 2022
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 5:30 AM Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 08:17:38PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > When CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS is enabled we currently increase the minimum
> > slab alignment to 16. This happens even if MTE is not supported in
> > hardware or disabled via kasan=off, which creates an unnecessary
> > memory overhead in those cases. Eliminate this overhead by making
> > the minimum slab alignment a runtime property and only aligning to
> > 16 if KASAN is enabled at runtime.
> >
> > On a DragonBoard 845c (non-MTE hardware) with a kernel built with
> > CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS, waiting for quiescence after a full Android
> > boot I see the following Slab measurements in /proc/meminfo (median
> > of 3 reboots):
> >
> > Before: 169020 kB
> > After: 167304 kB
> >
> > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I752e725179b43b144153f4b6f584ceb646473ead
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc at google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arc/include/asm/cache.h | 4 ++--
> > arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h | 19 +++++++++++++------
> > arch/microblaze/include/asm/page.h | 2 +-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h | 2 +-
> > arch/sparc/include/asm/cache.h | 2 +-
> > arch/xtensa/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
> > fs/binfmt_flat.c | 9 ++++++---
> > include/crypto/hash.h | 2 +-
> > include/linux/slab.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
> > mm/slab.c | 7 +++----
> > mm/slab_common.c | 3 +--
> > mm/slob.c | 6 +++---
> > 13 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> [+Cc slab people, Catalin and affected subsystems' folks]
>
> just FYI, There is similar discussion about kmalloc caches' alignment.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220405135758.774016-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com/
>
> It seems this is another demand for runtime resolution of slab
> alignment, But slightly different from kmalloc as there is no requirement
> for DMA alignment.
>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/cache.h
> > index f0f1fc5d62b6..b6a7763fd5d6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/cache.h
> > +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/cache.h
> > @@ -55,11 +55,11 @@
> > * Make sure slab-allocated buffers are 64-bit aligned when atomic64_t uses
> > * ARCv2 64-bit atomics (LLOCKD/SCONDD). This guarantess runtime 64-bit
> > * alignment for any atomic64_t embedded in buffer.
> > - * Default ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN is __alignof__(long long) which has a relaxed
> > + * Default ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN is __alignof__(long long) which has a relaxed
> > * value of 4 (and not 8) in ARC ABI.
> > */
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LL64) && defined(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC)
> > -#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN 8
> > +#define ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN 8
> > #endif
> >
>
> Why isn't it just ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN?
Because this is the minimum possible value of the minimum alignment
decided at runtime. I chose to give it a different name to
arch_slab_minalign() because the two have different meanings.
Granted this isn't a great name because of the stuttering but
hopefully it will prompt folks to investigate the meaning of this
constant if necessary.
> > extern int ioc_enable;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h
> > index e3ea34558ada..3e1018bb9805 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h
> > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> > * With EABI on ARMv5 and above we must have 64-bit aligned slab pointers.
> > */
> > #if defined(CONFIG_AEABI) && (__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 5)
> > -#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN 8
> > +#define ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN 8
> > #endif
> >
> > #define __read_mostly __section(".data..read_mostly")
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
> > index a074459f8f2f..38f171591c3f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #define __ASM_CACHE_H
> >
> > #include <asm/cputype.h>
> > +#include <asm/mte-def.h>
> >
> > #define CTR_L1IP_SHIFT 14
> > #define CTR_L1IP_MASK 3
> > @@ -49,15 +50,21 @@
> > */
> > #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN (128)
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS
> > -#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN (1ULL << KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT)
> > -#elif defined(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)
> > -#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN MTE_GRANULE_SIZE
> > -#endif
> > -
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >
> > #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > +#include <linux/kasan-enabled.h>
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS
> > +#define ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN (1ULL << KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT)
> > +#elif defined(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)
> > +static inline size_t arch_slab_minalign(void)
> > +{
> > + return kasan_hw_tags_enabled() ? MTE_GRANULE_SIZE :
> > + __alignof__(unsigned long long);
> > +}
> > +#define arch_slab_minalign() arch_slab_minalign()
> > +#endif
> >
>
> kasan_hw_tags_enabled() is also false when kasan is just not initialized yet.
> What about writing a new helper something like kasan_is_disabled()
> instead?
The decision of whether to enable KASAN is made early, before the slab
allocator is initialized (start_kernel -> smp_prepare_boot_cpu ->
kasan_init_hw_tags vs start_kernel -> mm_init -> kmem_cache_init). If
you think about it, this needs to be the case for KASAN to operate
correctly because it influences the behavior of the slab allocator via
the kasan_*poison* hooks. So I don't think we can end up calling this
function before then.
> > #define ICACHEF_ALIASING 0
> > #define ICACHEF_VPIPT 1
> > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/page.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/page.h
> > index 4b8b2fa78fc5..ccdbc1da3c3e 100644
> > --- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/page.h
> > +++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/page.h
> > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> > /* MS be sure that SLAB allocates aligned objects */
> > #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
> >
> > -#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
> > +#define ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
> >
> > /*
> > * PAGE_OFFSET -- the first address of the first page of memory. With MMU
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
> > index 9b58b104559e..7beb3b5d27c7 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
> > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> > * the flat loader aligns it accordingly.
> > */
> > #ifndef CONFIG_MMU
> > -#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN 16
> > +#define ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN 16
> > #endif
> >
> > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_CACHE_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/cache.h
> > index e62fd0e72606..9d8cb4687b7e 100644
> > --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/cache.h
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/cache.h
> > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
> > #ifndef _SPARC_CACHE_H
> > #define _SPARC_CACHE_H
> >
> > -#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
> > +#define ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
> >
> > #define L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
> > #define L1_CACHE_BYTES 32
> > diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/processor.h
> > index 4489a27d527a..e3ea278e3fcf 100644
> > --- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/processor.h
> > +++ b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/processor.h
> > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> > #include <asm/types.h>
> > #include <asm/regs.h>
> >
> > -#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN XTENSA_STACK_ALIGNMENT
> > +#define ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN XTENSA_STACK_ALIGNMENT
> >
> > /*
> > * User space process size: 1 GB.
> > diff --git a/fs/binfmt_flat.c b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> > index 626898150011..8ff1bf7d1e87 100644
> > --- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> > +++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> > @@ -64,7 +64,10 @@
> > * Here we can be a bit looser than the data sections since this
> > * needs to only meet arch ABI requirements.
> > */
> > -#define FLAT_STACK_ALIGN max_t(unsigned long, sizeof(void *), ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN)
> > +static size_t flat_stack_align(void)
> > +{
> > + return max_t(unsigned long, sizeof(void *), arch_slab_minalign());
> > +}
> >
> > #define RELOC_FAILED 0xff00ff01 /* Relocation incorrect somewhere */
> > #define UNLOADED_LIB 0x7ff000ff /* Placeholder for unused library */
> > @@ -148,7 +151,7 @@ static int create_flat_tables(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long arg_start
> > sp -= 2; /* argvp + envp */
> > sp -= 1; /* &argc */
> >
> > - current->mm->start_stack = (unsigned long)sp & -FLAT_STACK_ALIGN;
> > + current->mm->start_stack = (unsigned long)sp & -flat_stack_align();
> > sp = (unsigned long __user *)current->mm->start_stack;
> >
> > if (put_user(bprm->argc, sp++))
> > @@ -966,7 +969,7 @@ static int load_flat_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> > #endif
> > stack_len += (bprm->argc + 1) * sizeof(char *); /* the argv array */
> > stack_len += (bprm->envc + 1) * sizeof(char *); /* the envp array */
> > - stack_len = ALIGN(stack_len, FLAT_STACK_ALIGN);
> > + stack_len = ALIGN(stack_len, flat_stack_align());
> >
> > res = load_flat_file(bprm, &libinfo, 0, &stack_len);
> > if (res < 0)
> > diff --git a/include/crypto/hash.h b/include/crypto/hash.h
> > index f140e4643949..442c290f458c 100644
> > --- a/include/crypto/hash.h
> > +++ b/include/crypto/hash.h
> > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ struct ahash_alg {
> >
> > struct shash_desc {
> > struct crypto_shash *tfm;
> > - void *__ctx[] __aligned(ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN);
> > + void *__ctx[] __aligned(ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN);
> > };
> >
> > #define HASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE 64
> > diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> > index 373b3ef99f4e..80e517593372 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> > @@ -201,21 +201,33 @@ void kmem_dump_obj(void *object);
> > #endif
> >
> > /*
> > - * Setting ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN in arch headers allows a different alignment.
> > + * Setting ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN in arch headers allows a different alignment.
> > * Intended for arches that get misalignment faults even for 64 bit integer
> > * aligned buffers.
> > */
> > -#ifndef ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
> > -#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
> > +#ifndef ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN
> > +#define ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Arches can define this function if they want to decide the minimum slab
> > + * alignment at runtime. The value returned by the function must be
> > + * >= ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN.
> > + */
>
> Not only the value should be bigger than or equal to ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN,
> it should be compatible with ARCH_SLAB_MIN_MINALIGN.
What's the difference?
Peter
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list