[RFC PATCH 16/17] KVM: arm64: Enable parallel stage 2 MMU faults
Ben Gardon
bgardon at google.com
Thu Apr 21 09:35:27 PDT 2022
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:59 PM Oliver Upton <oupton at google.com> wrote:
>
> Voila! Since the map walkers are able to work in parallel there is no
> need to take the write lock on a stage 2 memory abort. Relax locking
> on map operations and cross fingers we got it right.
Might be worth a healthy sprinkle of lockdep on the functions taking
"shared" as an argument, just to make sure the wrong value isn't going
down a callstack you didn't expect.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton at google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 21 +++------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 63cf18cdb978..2881051c3743 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1127,7 +1127,6 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> gfn_t gfn;
> kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> bool logging_active = memslot_is_logging(memslot);
> - bool use_read_lock = false;
> unsigned long fault_level = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault_level(vcpu);
> unsigned long vma_pagesize, fault_granule;
> enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot = KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R;
> @@ -1162,8 +1161,6 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> if (logging_active) {
> force_pte = true;
> vma_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> - use_read_lock = (fault_status == FSC_PERM && write_fault &&
> - fault_granule == PAGE_SIZE);
> } else {
> vma_shift = get_vma_page_shift(vma, hva);
> }
> @@ -1267,15 +1264,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> if (exec_fault && device)
> return -ENOEXEC;
>
> - /*
> - * To reduce MMU contentions and enhance concurrency during dirty
> - * logging dirty logging, only acquire read lock for permission
> - * relaxation.
> - */
> - if (use_read_lock)
> - read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> - else
> - write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
Ugh, I which we could get rid of the analogous ugly block on x86.
> pgt = vcpu->arch.hw_mmu->pgt;
> if (mmu_notifier_retry(kvm, mmu_seq))
> goto out_unlock;
> @@ -1322,8 +1312,6 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> if (fault_status == FSC_PERM && vma_pagesize == fault_granule) {
> ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_relax_perms(pgt, fault_ipa, prot);
> } else {
> - WARN_ONCE(use_read_lock, "Attempted stage-2 map outside of write lock\n");
> -
> ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_map(pgt, fault_ipa, vma_pagesize,
> __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot,
> mmu_caches, true);
> @@ -1336,10 +1324,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> }
>
> out_unlock:
> - if (use_read_lock)
> - read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> - else
> - write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
> kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> return ret != -EAGAIN ? ret : 0;
> --
> 2.36.0.rc0.470.gd361397f0d-goog
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list