[PATCH v2 3/4] kselftest/arm64: Refactor parameter checking in mte_switch_mode()
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Tue Apr 19 03:32:42 PDT 2022
Currently we just have a big if statement with a non-specific diagnostic
checking both the mode and the tag. Since we'll need to dynamically check
for asymmetric mode support in the system and to improve debugability split
these checks out.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan at linuxfoundation.org>
---
.../testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
index 5327aa958171..260206f4dce0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
@@ -273,9 +273,18 @@ int mte_switch_mode(int mte_option, unsigned long incl_mask)
{
unsigned long en = 0;
- if (!(mte_option == MTE_SYNC_ERR || mte_option == MTE_ASYNC_ERR ||
- mte_option == MTE_NONE_ERR || incl_mask <= MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG)) {
- ksft_print_msg("FAIL: Invalid mte config option\n");
+ switch (mte_option) {
+ case MTE_NONE_ERR:
+ case MTE_SYNC_ERR:
+ case MTE_ASYNC_ERR:
+ break;
+ default:
+ ksft_print_msg("FAIL: Invalid MTE option %x\n", mte_option);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (!(incl_mask <= MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG)) {
+ ksft_print_msg("FAIL: Invalid incl_mask %lx\n", incl_mask);
return -EINVAL;
}
en = PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE;
--
2.30.2
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list