[PATCH V3 1/3] serial: stm32: remove infinite loop possibility in putchar function

Geert Uytterhoeven geert at linux-m68k.org
Tue Apr 19 01:59:38 PDT 2022


Hi Valentin,

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:54 AM Valentin Caron
<valentin.caron at foss.st.com> wrote:
> Rework stm32_usart_console_putchar() function in order to anticipate
> the case where the character can never be sent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron at foss.st.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
> @@ -1640,10 +1640,16 @@ static void stm32_usart_console_putchar(struct uart_port *port, unsigned char ch
>  {
>         struct stm32_port *stm32_port = to_stm32_port(port);
>         const struct stm32_usart_offsets *ofs = &stm32_port->info->ofs;
> +       u32 isr;
> +       int ret;
>
> -       while (!(readl_relaxed(port->membase + ofs->isr) & USART_SR_TXE))
> -               cpu_relax();
> -
> +       ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(port->membase + ofs->isr, isr,
> +                                               (isr & USART_SR_TXE), 100,
> +                                               STM32_USART_TIMEOUT_USEC);
> +       if (ret != 0) {
> +               dev_err(port->dev, "Error while sending data in UART TX : %d\n", ret);

Does it make sense to print this message, i.e. will the user ever see it?
Or is the failure above temporary?
I assume that you have seen this trigger?

> +               return;
> +       }
>         writel_relaxed(ch, port->membase + ofs->tdr);
>  }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list