[PATCH net-next v4 07/18] net: dsa: Replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
Vladimir Oltean
olteanv at gmail.com
Fri Apr 15 09:04:52 PDT 2022
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 02:29:36PM +0200, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
> macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
> variable after the loop body.
>
> To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
> concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
> found boolean [1].
>
> This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
> the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel at gmail.com>
> ---
I absolutely hate the robotic commit message, but the change looks like
it works, so:
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
> net/dsa/dsa.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> index 89c6c86e746f..645522c4dd4a 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> @@ -112,22 +112,21 @@ const struct dsa_device_ops *dsa_find_tagger_by_name(const char *buf)
>
> const struct dsa_device_ops *dsa_tag_driver_get(int tag_protocol)
> {
> - struct dsa_tag_driver *dsa_tag_driver;
> + struct dsa_tag_driver *dsa_tag_driver = NULL, *iter;
> const struct dsa_device_ops *ops;
> - bool found = false;
>
> request_module("%s%d", DSA_TAG_DRIVER_ALIAS, tag_protocol);
>
> mutex_lock(&dsa_tag_drivers_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(dsa_tag_driver, &dsa_tag_drivers_list, list) {
> - ops = dsa_tag_driver->ops;
> + list_for_each_entry(iter, &dsa_tag_drivers_list, list) {
> + ops = iter->ops;
> if (ops->proto == tag_protocol) {
> - found = true;
> + dsa_tag_driver = iter;
> break;
> }
> }
>
> - if (found) {
> + if (dsa_tag_driver) {
> if (!try_module_get(dsa_tag_driver->owner))
> ops = ERR_PTR(-ENOPROTOOPT);
> } else {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list