[PATCH 5.16 209/285] perf: arm-spe: Fix perf report --mem-mode

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: James Clark <james.clark at arm.com>

[ Upstream commit ffab487052054162b3b6c9c6005777ec6cfcea05 ]

Since commit bb30acae4c4dacfa ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem
info is not available") "perf mem report" and "perf report --mem-mode"
don't allow opening the file unless one of the events has
PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC set.

SPE doesn't have this set even though synthetic memory data is generated
after it is decoded. Fix this issue by setting DATA_SRC on SPE events.
This has no effect on the data collected because the SPE driver doesn't
do anything with that flag and doesn't generate samples.

Fixes: bb30acae4c4dacfa ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem info is not available")
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark at arm.com>
Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin at linux.intel.com>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez at arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa at kernel.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry at huawei.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria at linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220408144056.1955535-1-james.clark@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal at kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
index 2100d46ccf5e..bb4ab99afa7f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
@@ -239,6 +239,12 @@ static int arm_spe_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
 		arm_spe_set_timestamp(itr, arm_spe_evsel);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Set this only so that perf report knows that SPE generates memory info. It has no effect
+	 * on the opening of the event or the SPE data produced.
+	 */
+	evsel__set_sample_bit(arm_spe_evsel, DATA_SRC);
+
 	/* Add dummy event to keep tracking */
 	err = parse_events(evlist, "dummy:u", NULL);
 	if (err)
-- 
2.35.1