[PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add initial support for MA35D1

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2022-04-02 02:55:58)
> On 02/04/2022 01:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2022-03-30 23:32:04)
> >> On 31/03/2022 04:42, Jacky Huang wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/Makefile
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..e1e0c466bf5e
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/Makefile
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NUVOTON) += ma35d1-evb.dtb
> >>
> >> NAK
> >>
> >> This is actually some resend, but you did not version it, did not
> >> provide changelog.
> >>
> >> What is more - you ignored previously received comments.
> >>
> >> We do not work like this. If you do not agree with a comment, please
> >> keep discussion, not resend ignoring it.
> >>
> > 
> > Please be kind to newcomers. Not everyone has been working on the kernel
> > for 10+ years.
> 
> Sorry for being harsh.
> 
> > 
> > Please read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst. We should
> > probably add some more details to that document about including
> > changelogs comparing previous rounds, links to previous rounds for ease
> > of discovery, cover letters for multi-patch series, etc.
> 
> This is in general explained in:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.13/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L311
> Just no one really reads it...

I see there's
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#respond-to-review-comments

and there's a more detailed guide at 

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/development-process.html

> 
> I'll extend that section slightly.
> 

Awesome! Having documentation about best practices makes it easier to
reply with "read this document" vs writing an email each time it happens
(which is usually quite a lot).