[PATCH RESEND2] net: stmmac: Fix unset max_speed difference between DT and non-DT platforms

Chen-Yu Tsai wens at kernel.org
Fri Apr 1 22:00:36 PDT 2022


On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 12:42 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri,  1 Apr 2022 02:48:32 +0800 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org>
> >
> > In commit 9cbadf094d9d ("net: stmmac: support max-speed device tree
> > property"), when DT platforms don't set "max-speed", max_speed is set to
> > -1; for non-DT platforms, it stays the default 0.
> >
> > Prior to commit eeef2f6b9f6e ("net: stmmac: Start adding phylink support"),
> > the check for a valid max_speed setting was to check if it was greater
> > than zero. This commit got it right, but subsequent patches just checked
> > for non-zero, which is incorrect for DT platforms.
> >
> > In commit 92c3807b9ac3 ("net: stmmac: convert to phylink_get_linkmodes()")
> > the conversion switched completely to checking for non-zero value as a
> > valid value, which caused 1000base-T to stop getting advertised by
> > default.
> >
> > Instead of trying to fix all the checks, simply leave max_speed alone if
> > DT property parsing fails.
> >
> > Fixes: 9cbadf094d9d ("net: stmmac: support max-speed device tree property")
> > Fixes: 92c3807b9ac3 ("net: stmmac: convert to phylink_get_linkmodes()")
> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org>
> > Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk>
> > ---
> >
> > Resend2: CC Srinivas at Linaro instead of ST. Collected Russell's ack.
> > Resend: added Srinivas (author of first fixed commit) to CC list.
> >
> > This was first noticed on ROC-RK3399-PC, and also observed on ROC-RK3328-CC.
> > The fix was tested on ROC-RK3328-CC and Libre Computer ALL-H5-ALL-CC.
>
> This patch got marked Changes Requested in pw, but I can't see why,
> so I went on a limb and applied it. LMK if that was a mistake,
> otherwise its commit c21cabb0fd0b ("net: stmmac: Fix unset max_speed
> difference between DT and non-DT platforms") in net.

I don't remember anyone asking for any changes.

Thanks
ChenYu



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list