[PATCH] KVM: arm64: Allow KVM to be disabled from the command line

Marc Zyngier maz at kernel.org
Thu Sep 30 03:29:49 PDT 2021


On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:35:46 +0100,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com> wrote:
> 
> On 03/09/2021 10:16, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Although KVM can be compiled out of the kernel, it cannot be disabled
> > at runtime. Allow this possibility by introducing a new mode that
> > will prevent KVM from initialising.
> > 
> > This is useful in the (limited) circumstances where you don't want
> > KVM to be available (what is wrong with you?), or when you want
> > to install another hypervisor instead (good luck with that).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  3 +++
> >   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h               |  1 +
> >   arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c              |  1 +
> >   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                            | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >   4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index 91ba391f9b32..cc5f68846434 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -2365,6 +2365,9 @@
> >   	kvm-arm.mode=
> >   			[KVM,ARM] Select one of KVM/arm64's modes of operation.
> >   +			none: Forcefully disable KVM and run in nVHE
> > mode,
> > +			      preventing KVM from ever initialising.
> > +
> >   			nvhe: Standard nVHE-based mode, without support for
> >   			      protected guests.
> >   diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index f8be56d5342b..019490c67976 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> >   enum kvm_mode {
> >   	KVM_MODE_DEFAULT,
> >   	KVM_MODE_PROTECTED,
> > +	KVM_MODE_NONE,
> >   };
> >   enum kvm_mode kvm_get_mode(void);
> >   diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
> > b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
> > index d8e606fe3c21..57013c1b6552 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
> > @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static const struct {
> >   	char	alias[FTR_ALIAS_NAME_LEN];
> >   	char	feature[FTR_ALIAS_OPTION_LEN];
> >   } aliases[] __initconst = {
> > +	{ "kvm-arm.mode=none",		"id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0" },
> >   	{ "kvm-arm.mode=nvhe",		"id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0" },
> >   	{ "kvm-arm.mode=protected",	"id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0" },
> >   	{ "arm64.nobti",		"id_aa64pfr1.bt=0" },
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > index fe102cd2e518..cdc70e238316 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > @@ -2064,6 +2064,11 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
> >   		return -ENODEV;
> >   	}
> >   +	if (kvm_get_mode() == KVM_MODE_NONE) {
> > +		kvm_info("KVM disabled from command line\n");
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +
> >   	in_hyp_mode = is_kernel_in_hyp_mode();
> >     	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_DEVICE_LOAD_ACQUIRE)
> > ||
> > @@ -2137,8 +2142,15 @@ static int __init early_kvm_mode_cfg(char *arg)
> >   		return 0;
> >   	}
> >   -	if (strcmp(arg, "nvhe") == 0 &&
> > !WARN_ON(is_kernel_in_hyp_mode()))
> > +	if (strcmp(arg, "nvhe") == 0 && !WARN_ON(is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())) {
> > +		kvm_mode = KVM_MODE_DEFAULT;
> >   		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (strcmp(arg, "none") == 0 && !WARN_ON(is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())) {
> 
> nit: Does this really need to WARN here ? Unlike the "nvhe" case, if the
> user wants to keep the KVM out of the picture for, say debugging
> something, it is perfectly Ok to allow the kernel to be running at EL2
> without having to change the Firmware to alter the landing EL for the
> kernel ?

Well, the doc says "run in nVHE mode" and the option forces
id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0. The WARN_ON() will only fires on broken^Wfruity HW
that is VHE only. Note that this doesn't rely on any firmware change
(we drop from EL2 to EL1 and stay there).

We could add another option (none-vhe?) that stays at EL2 and still
disables KVM if there is an appetite for it.

> Otherwise,
> 
> Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> 

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list