[PATCH] arm64: clear_page() shouldn't use DC ZVA when DCZID_EL0.DZP == 1
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Tue Oct 26 04:22:20 PDT 2021
On 2021-10-26 04:48, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> Currently, clear_page() uses DC ZVA instruction unconditionally. But it
> should make sure that DCZID_EL0.DZP, which indicates whether or not use
> of DC ZVA instruction is prohibited, is zero when using the instruction.
> Use stp as memset does instead when DCZID_EL0.DZP == 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw at google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/lib/clear_page.S | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_page.S b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_page.S
> index b84b179edba3..7ce1bfa4081c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_page.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_page.S
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> */
> SYM_FUNC_START_PI(clear_page)
> mrs x1, dczid_el0
> + tbnz x1, #4, 2f /* Branch if DC GVA is prohibited */
> and w1, w1, #0xf
> mov x2, #4
> lsl x1, x2, x1
> @@ -25,5 +26,15 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_PI(clear_page)
> tst x0, #(PAGE_SIZE - 1)
> b.ne 1b
> ret
> +
> +2: mov x1, #(PAGE_SIZE)
> + sub x0, x0, #16 /* Pre-bias. */
Out of curiosity, what's this for? It's not like we need to worry about
PAGE_SIZE or page addresses being misaligned. I don't really see why
we'd need a different condition from the DC ZVA loop.
Robin.
> +3: stp xzr, xzr, [x0, #16]
> + stp xzr, xzr, [x0, #32]
> + stp xzr, xzr, [x0, #48]
> + stp xzr, xzr, [x0, #64]!
> + subs x1, x1, #64
> + b.gt 3b
> + ret
> SYM_FUNC_END_PI(clear_page)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_page)
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list