[PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: arm64: Allow guest to set the OSLK bit
Ricardo Koller
ricarkol at google.com
Wed Nov 3 20:47:42 PDT 2021
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:31:35PM -0700, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 2:47 AM Oliver Upton <oupton at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Allow writes to OSLAR and forward the OSLK bit to OSLSR. Change the
> > reset value of the OSLK bit to 1. Allow the value to be migrated by
> > making OSLSR_EL1.OSLK writable from userspace.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton at google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 6 ++++++
> > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > index b268082d67ed..6ba4dc97b69d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > @@ -127,7 +127,13 @@
> > #define SYS_DBGWCRn_EL1(n) sys_reg(2, 0, 0, n, 7)
> > #define SYS_MDRAR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 0, 0)
> > #define SYS_OSLAR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 0, 4)
> > +
> > +#define SYS_OSLAR_OSLK BIT(0)
> > +
> > #define SYS_OSLSR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 1, 4)
> > +
> > +#define SYS_OSLSR_OSLK BIT(1)
> > +
> > #define SYS_OSDLR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 3, 4)
> > #define SYS_DBGPRCR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 4, 4)
> > #define SYS_DBGCLAIMSET_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 7, 8, 6)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > index 0326b3df0736..acd8aa2e5a44 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@
> > * 64bit interface.
> > */
> >
> > +static int reg_from_user(u64 *val, const void __user *uaddr, u64 id);
> > +static int reg_to_user(void __user *uaddr, const u64 *val, u64 id);
> > +static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
> > +
> > static bool read_from_write_only(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct sys_reg_params *params,
> > const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > @@ -287,6 +291,24 @@ static bool trap_loregion(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool trap_oslar_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > + struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > +{
> > + u64 oslsr;
> > +
> > + if (!p->is_write)
> > + return read_from_write_only(vcpu, p, r);
> > +
> > + /* Forward the OSLK bit to OSLSR */
> > + oslsr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, OSLSR_EL1) & ~SYS_OSLSR_OSLK;
> > + if (p->regval & SYS_OSLAR_OSLK)
> > + oslsr |= SYS_OSLSR_OSLK;
> > +
> > + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, OSLSR_EL1) = oslsr;
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool trap_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > @@ -309,9 +331,10 @@ static int set_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> >
> > - if (val != rd->val)
> > + if ((val | SYS_OSLSR_OSLK) != rd->val)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, rd->reg) = val;
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1176,10 +1199,6 @@ static bool access_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > return __access_id_reg(vcpu, p, r, true);
> > }
> >
> > -static int reg_from_user(u64 *val, const void __user *uaddr, u64 id);
> > -static int reg_to_user(void __user *uaddr, const u64 *val, u64 id);
> > -static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
> > -
> > /* Visibility overrides for SVE-specific control registers */
> > static unsigned int sve_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
> > @@ -1456,8 +1475,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> > DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(15),
> >
> > { SYS_DESC(SYS_MDRAR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> > - { SYS_DESC(SYS_OSLAR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> > - { SYS_DESC(SYS_OSLSR_EL1), trap_oslsr_el1, reset_val, OSLSR_EL1, 0x00000008,
> > + { SYS_DESC(SYS_OSLAR_EL1), trap_oslar_el1 },
> > + { SYS_DESC(SYS_OSLSR_EL1), trap_oslsr_el1, reset_val, OSLSR_EL1, 0x0000000A,
> > .set_user = set_oslsr_el1, },
>
> Reviewed-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw at google.com>
>
> I assume the reason why you changed the reset value for the
> register is because Arm ARM says "the On a Cold reset,
> this field resets to 1".
>
> "4.82 KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT" in Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst says:
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> - System registers: Reset to their architecturally defined
> values as for a warm reset to EL1 (resp. SVC)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Since Arm ARM doesn't say anything about a warm reset for the field,
> I would guess the bit doesn't necessarily need to be set.
That would be great, because it would avoid the migration issue that
Oliver described in [PATCH v2 4/6]:
There is an issue, though, with migration: older KVM will not show
OSLSR_EL1 on KVM_GET_REG_LIST. However, in order to provide an
architectural OS Lock, its reset value must be 1 (enabled). This would
all have the effect of discarding the guest's OS lock value and
blocking all debug exceptions intended for the guest until the next
reboot.
>
> Thanks,
> Reiji
>
>
> > { SYS_DESC(SYS_OSDLR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> > { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGPRCR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> > @@ -1930,7 +1949,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp14_regs[] = {
> >
> > DBGBXVR(0),
> > /* DBGOSLAR */
> > - { Op1( 0), CRn( 1), CRm( 0), Op2( 4), trap_raz_wi },
> > + { Op1( 0), CRn( 1), CRm( 0), Op2( 4), trap_oslar_el1 },
> > DBGBXVR(1),
> > /* DBGOSLSR */
> > { Op1( 0), CRn( 1), CRm( 1), Op2( 4), trap_oslsr_el1, NULL, OSLSR_EL1 },
> > --
> > 2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog
> >
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list