[PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: suggest _BITULL() and _BITUL() for UAPI headers

[Joe Richey]

From: Joe Richey <joerichey at google.com>

Instead of just ignoring UAPI headers, reccomend the UAPI compatible
macros if a user adds something that looks like (1 << n). Normal kernel
code will continue to get BIT_ULL() and BIT() reccomended.

This change also modifies the $realfile regex to match headers that have
"include/uapi" anywhere in their path so paths like:
    tools/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
    arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hwcap2.h
get recognized as UAPI headers.

Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey at google.com>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index d65334588eb4..47edc61b74c2 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -7020,15 +7020,17 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
-# check for #defines like: 1 << <digit> that could be BIT(digit), it is not exported to uapi
-		if ($realfile !~ m@^include/uapi/@ &&
-		    $line =~ /#\s*define\s+\w+\s+\(?\s*1\s*([ulUL]*)\s*\<\<\s*(?:\d+|$Ident)\s*\)?/) {
-			my $ull = "";
-			$ull = "_ULL" if (defined($1) && $1 =~ /ll/i);
+# check for #defines like: 1 << <digit> that could be BIT(digit) or similar
+		if ($line =~ /#\s*define\s+\w+\s+\(?\s*1\s*([ulUL]*)\s*\<\<\s*(?:\d+|$Ident)\s*\)?/) {
+			my $ull = (defined($1) && $1 =~ /ll/i);
+			my $macroname = $ull ? "BIT_ULL" : "BIT";
+			if ($realfile =~ m at include/uapi/@) {
+				$macroname = $ull ? "_BITULL" : "_BITUL";
+			}
 			if (CHK("BIT_MACRO",
-				"Prefer using the BIT$ull macro\n" . $herecurr) &&
+				"Prefer using the $macroname macro\n" . $herecurr) &&
 			    $fix) {
-				$fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\(?\s*1\s*[ulUL]*\s*<<\s*(\d+|$Ident)\s*\)?/BIT${ull}($1)/;
+				$fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\(?\s*1\s*[ulUL]*\s*<<\s*(\d+|$Ident)\s*\)?/${macroname}($1)/;
 			}
 		}
 
-- 
2.31.1