[PATCH 8/8] arm64: Rewrite __arch_clear_user()
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Wed May 12 06:06:58 PDT 2021
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:31:39PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-05-12 11:48, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 05:12:38PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > Rewrite __arch_clear_user() with regular
> > > USER() annotations so that it's clearer what's going on, and take the
> > > opportunity to minimise the branchiness in the most common paths, which
> > > also allows the exception fixup to return a more accurate result.
> >
> > IIUC this isn't always accurate for the {4,2,1}-byte cases; example
> > below. I'm not sure whether that's intentional since the commit message
> > says "more accurate" rather than "accurate".
>
> Indeed, the "more" was definitely significant :)
:)
> > If we think that under-estimating is fine, I reckon it'd be worth a
> > comment to make that clear.
>
> Indeed for smaller amounts there's no change in fixup behaviour at all, but
> I have to assume that underestimating by up to 100% is probably OK since
> we've been underestimating by fully 100% for nearly 10 years now. I don't
> believe it's worth having any more complexity than necessary for the fault
> case - grepping for clear_user() usage suggests that nobody really cares
> about the return value beyond whether it's zero or not, so the minor
> "improvement" here is more of a nice-to-have TBH.
>
> The existing comment doesn't actually explain anything either, which is why
> I didn't replace it, but I'm happy to add something if you like.
I don't have strong feelings either way, but I think that we should at
least document this, since that'll at least save us rehashing the same
point in future. :)
That said, IIUC to make this always accurate we only need two ADDs (diff
below). Since those will only be executed at most once each, I suspect
they won't have a measureable impact in practice.
So maybe it's worth adding them to avoid any risk that someone needs
this to be accurate in future?
Mark.
---->8----
diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
index 1005345b4066..7ef553ec2677 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
@@ -32,12 +32,14 @@ USER(9f, sttr xzr, [x2, #-8])
2: tbz x1, #2, 3f
USER(9f, sttr wzr, [x0])
+ add x0, x0, #4
USER(9f, sttr wzr, [x2, #-4])
mov x0, #0
ret
3: tbz x1, #1, 4f
USER(9f, sttrh wzr, [x0])
+ add x0, x0, #2
4: tbz x1, #0, 5f
USER(9f, sttrb wzr, [x2, #-1])
5: mov x0, #0
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list