[RFC PATCH] perf cs-etm: Handle valid-but-zero timestamps
James Clark
james.clark at arm.com
Tue May 11 03:00:14 PDT 2021
On 11/05/2021 11:05, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 01:39:04PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
>> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 01:02:35PM +0300, James Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/05/2021 12:58, James Clark wrote:
>>>> There is an intermittent issue on Trogdor devices that
>>>> results in all Coresight timestamps having a value of zero.
>>>
>>> I've attached a file here that has the issue. From the dump you
>>> can see the zero timestamps:
>>>
>>> Idx:69; ID:10; I_TIMESTAMP : Timestamp.; Updated val = 0x0
>>> Idx:71; ID:10; I_ATOM_F1 : Atom format 1.; E
>>> Idx:72; ID:10; I_ADDR_S_IS0 : Address, Short, IS0.; Addr=0xFFFFFFE723C65824 ~[0x5824]
>>>
>>> This doesn't have an impact on decoding as they end up being
>>> decoded in file order as in with timeless mode.
>>
>> Just remind, as Mike has mentioned that if the timestamp is zero, it
>> means the hardware setting for timestamp is not enabled properly. So
>> for system wide or per CPU mode tracing, it's better to double check
>> what's the reason the timestamp is not enabled properly.
>>
>> IIUC, this patch breaks the existed rational in the code. Let's think
>> about there have 4 CPUs, every CPU has its own AUX trace buffer, and
>> when decode the trace data, it will use 4 queues to track the packets
>> and every queue has its timestamp.
>>
>> CPU0: cs_etm_queue -> ... -> packet_queue->timestamp
>> CPU1: cs_etm_queue -> ... -> packet_queue->timestamp
>> CPU2: cs_etm_queue -> ... -> packet_queue->timestamp
>> CPU3: cs_etm_queue -> ... -> packet_queue->timestamp
>>
>> The issue is if all CPUs' timestamp are zero, it's impossible to find
>> a way to synthesize samples in the right time order.
>
> I saw Denis's replying for the hardware issue for timestamp, wander if
> can add a new option "--force-aux-ts-zero" to override the hardware
> timestamp issue. Without the option "--force-aux-ts-zero", the
> developers still have chance to observe the failure case caused by the
> abnormal timestamps.
>
Hi Leo,
Now that you mention arguments, I remembered that you already can force something like that
with --disable-order.
There is also a recent commit "perf intel-pt: Support Z itrace option for timeless decoding"
which introduces this option:
@@ -869,6 +869,7 @@ The letters are:
L synthesize last branch entries on existing event records
s skip initial number of events
q quicker (less detailed) decoding
+ Z prefer to ignore timestamps (so-called "timeless" decoding)
I will investigate if these are more relevant to fix this issue.
Thanks
James
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list