[PATCH] Revert "irqbypass: do not start cons/prod when failed connect"

[Marc Zyngier]

On Mon, 10 May 2021 09:32:54 +0100,
"Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/10/2021 3:09 PM, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 5/10/2021 12:34 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> 
> >> 在 2021/5/10 上午11:00, Zhu, Lingshan 写道:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On 5/10/2021 10:43 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> 在 2021/5/8 下午3:11, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> >>>>> This reverts commit a979a6aa009f3c99689432e0cdb5402a4463fb88.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> The reverted commit may cause VM freeze on arm64 platform.
> >>>>> Because on arm64 platform, stop a consumer will suspend the VM,
> >>>>> the VM will freeze without a start consumer
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu at intel.com>
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> >>>> 
> >>>> Please resubmit with the formal process of stable
> >>>> (stable-kernel-rules.rst).
> >>> sure, I will re-submit it to stable kernel once it is merged into
> >>> Linus tree.
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I think it's better to resubmit (option 1), see how
> >> stable-kernel-rules.rst said:
> >> 
> >> ""
> >> 
> >> :ref:`option_1` is **strongly** preferred, is the easiest and most
> >> common.
> >> :ref:`option_2` and :ref:`option_3` are more useful if the patch
> >> isn't deemed
> >> worthy at the time it is applied to a public git tree (for
> >> instance, because
> >> it deserves more regression testing first).
> >> 
> >> """
> >> 
> >> Thanks
> > OK, works for me, I will add cc stable, and resubmit it soon
> > 
> > Thanks!
> I just seeMarc has already added "Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org", and
> he would take the patch in his tree, so I think no need to resend.

That's fine, I can fix things up myself and queue the fix for -rc2.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.