[RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
Madhavan T. Venkataraman
madvenka at linux.microsoft.com
Thu May 6 08:57:09 PDT 2021
On 5/6/21 10:37 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 10:30:21AM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
>> On 5/6/21 9:12 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:36:14PM -0500, madvenka at linux.microsoft.com wrote:
>
>>> I was thinking it'd be good to do this by modifying SYM_CODE_START() to
>>> emit the section, that way nobody can forget to put any SYM_CODE into a
>>> special section. That does mean we'd have to first introduce a new
>
>> OK. I could make the section an argument to SYM_CODE*() so that a developer
>> will never miss that. Some documentation may be in order so the guidelines
>> are clear. I will do the doc patch separately, if that is alright with
>> you all.
>
> I was thinking to have standard SYM_CODE default to a section then a
> variant for anything that cares (like how we have SYM_FUNC_PI and
> friends for the PI code for EFI).
>
OK.
>>> We also have a bunch of things like __cpu_soft_restart which don't seem
>>> to be called out here but need to be in .idmap.text.
>
>> It is already in .idmap.text.
>
> Right, I meant that I was expecting to see things that need to be in a
> specific section other than .code.text called out separately here if
> we're enumerating them. Though if the annotations are done separately
> then this patch wouldn't need to do that calling out at all, it'd be
> covered as part of fiddling around with the annotations.
>
OK.
Madhavan
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list