[PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb EP voltage regulators
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Wed Mar 31 12:46:50 BST 2021
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:23:35PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:30 AM Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> > For a soldered down part I'd expect we'd want both (if the host even
> > cares) - for anything except a supply that I/O or something else shared
> > is referenced off there's no great reason why it has to be physically
> > the same supply going to every device on the bus so each device should
> > be able to specify separately.
> Our developer and reference boards frequently have Mini and half-mini
> PCIe sockets (a few exceptions), whereas production boards are mostly
> soldered down.
On reflection I think the above probably also applies to sockets - you'd
just have to have a socket visible in the DT.
> If I resubmit this pullreq so that it looks for "vpcie12v-supply"
> and "vpcie3v3-supply" in the host node, will that be acceptable for
> both of you?
I think you will need both (assuming the controller actually physically
gets the supplies) - like I say the sockets/devices may not all share
the same 12V and 3.3V rails.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20210331/181f4952/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list