[PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW

Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Tue Mar 30 03:56:43 BST 2021


On 24-03-21, 10:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan at mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml      |  127 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..0f3ad47
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan at mediatek.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > +  CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> > +  SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> > +  for multiple clusters.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +    maxItems: 2
> > +    description: |
> > +      Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> > +      HW bases in each frequency domain.
> > +
> > +  "#performance-domain-cells":
> 
> A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land 
> first.

Sudeep, what happened to the series you had on this ? This patchset
has been blocked for a long time now, can we get that merged soonish
somehow ?

-- 
viresh



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list