[PATCH V2 1/5] dt-bindings: Added the yaml bindings for DCC

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Souradeep Chowdhury (2021-03-25 01:02:32)
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c6e0a9c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Data Capture and Compare
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Souradeep Chowdhury <schowdhu at codeaurora.org>
> +
> +description: |
> +    DCC (Data Capture and Compare) is a DMA engine which is used to save
> +    configuration data or system memory contents during catastrophic failure
> +    or SW trigger.DCC is used to capture and store data for debugging purpose

Add space between trigger. and DCC?

> +
> +

Drop double newline?

> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    items:
> +      - enum:
> +          - qcom,sm8150-dcc
> +      - const: qcom,dcc
> +
> +  reg:
> +    items:
> +      - description: DCC base register region
> +      - description: DCC RAM base register region
> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: dcc
> +      - const: dcc-ram
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - reg-names

Do we really need reg names? Seems like we can assume the ordering.

> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    dcc at 10a2000{

dma at 10a2000? Or debug at 10a2000?

> +                compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dcc","qcom,dcc";
> +                reg = <0x010a2000  0x1000>,
> +                      <0x010ad000  0x2000>;
> +                reg-names = "dcc", "dcc-ram";
> +    };