[PATCH] arm64: Document requirements for fine grained traps at boot
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Mon Mar 29 18:06:57 BST 2021
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:55:41AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:49:17PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > + - HAFGRTR_EL2, HDFGWTR_EL2, HDFGRTR_EL2, HFGWTR_EL2, HFGRTR_EL2 and
> > + HFGITR_EL2 must be initialised to 0.
> While this requirement is correct, documenting such individual registers
> doesn't scales well. You may run a 5 year old kernel on a newer CPU and
> we can't predict which control registers have been added and what
> side-effect they have. The architecture, at least for the above
I'm not a huge fan of writing things this way either, I'd inferred that
this sort of minimal and specific thing was the idiom desired so was
trying to follow.
> Can we instead have a broad statement regarding any EL1/EL2 registers
> that they should be either rest to 0 or to the architectural (warm)
> reset value as per the ARM ARM? Or something like any feature must be
> disabled by default at the EL1/EL2 control registers level and this
> would imply the fine-grained traps.
> We currently have this statement:
> All writable architected system registers at the exception level where
> the kernel image will be entered must be initialised by software at a
> higher exception level to prevent execution in an UNKNOWN state.
> The "prevent execution in an UNKNOWN state" needs to be clearer. The
> above should also include exception levels _below_ the one where the
> kernel is entered. It doesn't help if KVM is old and has no clue of new
> EL1-specific registers.
Right, I think both those things are needed to cover the general case.
The exception levels bit is hopefully straightforward but wording for
the clarification bit is more tricky - I'll try to come up with
something.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20210329/6941ef9c/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list