[PATCH drivers/perf 4/4] drivers/perf: fixing coding style issues

[Mark Rutland]

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:49:33AM +0800, tiantao (H) wrote:
> 
> 在 2021/3/25 20:30, Robin Murphy 写道:
> > On 2021-03-25 07:16, Tian Tao wrote:
> > >    no functional changes.
> > > 
> > >    Fix checkpatch error:
> > >    ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
> > >    #210: FILE: arm_pmu_platform.c:210:
> > >    + if (node && (of_id = of_match_node(of_table, pdev->dev.of_node))) {
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6 at hisilicon.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao2 at hisilicon.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Qi Liu <liuqi115 at huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 10 ++++++----
> > >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> > > b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> > > index 933bd84..11b47c6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> > > @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev,
> > >                const struct of_device_id *of_table,
> > >                const struct pmu_probe_info *probe_table)
> > >   {
> > > -    const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> > > +    const struct of_device_id *of_id = NULL;
> > >       armpmu_init_fn init_fn;
> > >       struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > >       struct arm_pmu *pmu;
> > > @@ -207,11 +207,13 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev,
> > >       if (ret)
> > >           goto out_free;
> > >   -    if (node && (of_id = of_match_node(of_table,
> > > pdev->dev.of_node))) {
> > > +    if (node)
> > > +        of_id = of_match_node(of_table, node);
> > 
> > Looks like you could probably refactor the whole thing to use
> > of_device_get_match_data() and make it even cleaner.
> Thanks for your suggestion, I'm waiting for the other three patch review
> suggestions, after that I'm deciding whether to send a patchset or send a
> patch alone to fix this problem.

FWIW, patches 1-3 all look sound to me given that they're trivial
whitespace fixes. So for patches 1-3:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>

I'll leave it to Will to decide whether to pick those now or to wait for
a respin of the whole series.

Thanks,
Mark.