[PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Convert to json-schema
Enric Balletbo Serra
eballetbo at gmail.com
Thu Mar 25 11:16:06 GMT 2021
Hi Elaine,
Missatge de elaine.zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com> del dia dj., 25 de
març 2021 a les 7:43:
>
> Hi,Heiko:
>
> 在 2021/3/24 下午9:31, Heiko Stübner 写道:
> > Am Mittwoch, 24. März 2021, 11:32:42 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra:
> >> On 24/3/21 11:25, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> >>> Hi Elaine,
> >>>
> >>> On 24/3/21 11:18, elaine.zhang wrote:
> >>>> Hi, Enric
> >>>>
> >>>> 在 2021/3/24 下午5:56, Enric Balletbo i Serra 写道:
> >>>>> Hi Elaine,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is not the exact version I sent, and you reintroduced a "problem" that were
> >>>>> already solved/discussed on previous versions. See below:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 24/3/21 8:16, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> >>>>>> Convert the soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt binding document to
> >>>>>> json-schema and move to the power bindings directory.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo at collabora.com>
> >>>>> If you do significant is a good practice shortly describe them within [] here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>
> >>>>> Note that my last version already had the
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Which should be fine for merging (with probably only minor changes) and you
> >>>>> could maintain if you don't do significant changes, but that's not the case, as
> >>>>> I said, you are reintroducing one problem. Please review the comments already
> >>>>> received on this patchset or similar patchsets to avoid this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> .../power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml | 284 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>> .../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 136 ---------
> >>>>>> 2 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
> >>>>>> create mode 100644
> >>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
> >>>>>> delete mode 100644
> >>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git
> >>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
> >>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
> >>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>> index 000000000000..a220322c5139
> >>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
> >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
> >>>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >>>>>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>>>>> +---
> >>>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml#
> >>>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +title: Rockchip Power Domains
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +maintainers:
> >>>>>> + - Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>
> >>>>>> + - Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> >>>>> Up to Rob, but I don't think Rob would like to be the maintainer. I think you
> >>>>> can only include yourself and Heiko.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> + - Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +description: |
> >>>>>> + Rockchip processors include support for multiple power domains which can be
> >>>>>> + powered up/down by software based on different application scenarios to
> >>>>>> save power.
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + Power domains contained within power-controller node are generic power domain
> >>>>>> + providers documented in
> >>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml.
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + IP cores belonging to a power domain should contain a "power-domains"
> >>>>>> + property that is a phandle for the power domain node representing the domain.
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +properties:
> >>>>>> + $nodename:
> >>>>>> + const: power-controller
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + compatible:
> >>>>>> + enum:
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,px30-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3036-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3066-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3128-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3188-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3228-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3288-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3328-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3366-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3368-power-controller
> >>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3399-power-controller
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + "#power-domain-cells":
> >>>>>> + const: 1
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + "#address-cells":
> >>>>>> + const: 1
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + "#size-cells":
> >>>>>> + const: 0
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +patternProperties:
> >>>>>> + "^pd_[0-9a-z_]{2,10}@[0-9a-f]+$":
> >>>>>> + type: object
> >>>>>> + description: |
> >>>>>> + Represents the power domains within the power controller node as
> >>>>>> documented
> >>>>>> + in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml.
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>> The node names must be generic, as this is power-domain must be in the form:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +patternProperties:
> >>>>> + "^power-domain@[0-9a-f]+$":
> >>>> In this way, dtbs_check cannot be passed, and all the usage methods in dts of
> >>>> Rockchip need to be corrected, which I think is a bigger change.
> >>> Well, the problem is in the Rockchip dtbs, so needs to be fixed there. The
> >>> bindings must describe hardware in a generic way, not describe the actual dtbs
> >>> to not report errors.
> >>>
> >> FWIW I remember I did something regarding this but never sent to upstream, feel
> >> free to pick if you find useful.
> >>
> >> *
> >> https://gitlab.collabora.com/eballetbo/linux/-/commit/12499f223e3d33602449b9102404fe573fb804f5
> >> *
> >> https://gitlab.collabora.com/eballetbo/linux/-/commit/12499f223e3d33602449b9102404fe573fb804f5
> >> *
> >> https://gitlab.collabora.com/eballetbo/linux/-/commit/492bf2213c341152a1c2423242c5634b9e53ff27
> > looks good that way. I did look at the power-domain driver and
> > we're (of course) not doing anything with the name in front of the @ :-) .
> >
> > So I'd be happy to get these.
> >
> > Heiko
>
> I still don't want to modify this, I think the PD summary will become
> less intuitive.
>
This is because in the pm_domainss driver you have:
pd->genpd.name = node->name;
You can use the full_name or add a meaningful name to the driver if
you want. We solved this on Mediatek with the following patches [1]
Again, IMO this is a driver problem, not a binding problem. The
bindings shouldn't know about debugfs entry names.
Thanks,
Enric
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=438523
> Now:
>
> domain status slaves
> /device runtime status
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> pd_pipe on
> /devices/platform/3c0800000.pcie unsupported
> /devices/platform/fc800000.sata active
> /devices/platform/usbdrd/fcc00000.dwc3 active
> /devices/platform/usbhost/fd000000.dwc3 active
> pd_rkvenc off-0
> /devices/platform/fdf40f00.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdf40000.rkvenc suspended
> pd_rkvdec off-0
> /devices/platform/fdf80800.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdf80200.rkvdec suspended
> pd_vpu off-0
> /devices/platform/fdea0800.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdea0400.vdpu suspended
> pd_rga off-0
> /devices/platform/fded0480.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdee0800.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdef0800.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdee0000.vepu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdef0000.iep suspended
> /devices/platform/fded0000.jpegd suspended
> /devices/platform/fdeb0000.rk_rga suspended
> pd_vo on
> /devices/platform/fe850000.mipi-dphy suspended
> /devices/platform/fe040000.vop active
> /devices/platform/fe0c0000.edp suspended
> /devices/platform/fe0a0000.hdmi active
> /devices/platform/fe060000.dsi active
> pd_vi off-0
> /devices/platform/fdff1a00.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdff0000.rkisp suspended
> pd_gpu on
> /devices/platform/fde60000.gpu active
> pd_npu off-0
>
> If modify to power-domain@:
>
> domain status slaves
> /device runtime status
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> power-domain on
> /devices/platform/3c0800000.pcie unsupported
> /devices/platform/fc800000.sata active
> /devices/platform/usbdrd/fcc00000.dwc3 active
> /devices/platform/usbhost/fd000000.dwc3 active
> power-domain off-0
> /devices/platform/fdf40f00.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdf40000.rkvenc suspended
> power-domain off-0
> /devices/platform/fdf80800.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdf80200.rkvdec suspended
> power-domain off-0
> /devices/platform/fdea0800.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdea0400.vdpu suspended
> power-domain off-0
> /devices/platform/fded0480.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdee0800.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdef0800.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdee0000.vepu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdef0000.iep suspended
> /devices/platform/fded0000.jpegd suspended
> /devices/platform/fdeb0000.rk_rga suspended
> power-domain on
> /devices/platform/fe850000.mipi-dphy suspended
> /devices/platform/fe040000.vop active
> /devices/platform/fe0c0000.edp suspended
> /devices/platform/fe0a0000.hdmi active
> /devices/platform/fe060000.dsi active
> power-domain off-0
> /devices/platform/fdff1a00.iommu suspended
> /devices/platform/fdff0000.rkisp suspended
> power-domain on
> /devices/platform/fde60000.gpu active
> power-domain off-0
> console:/ #
>
> I think the now one is more intuitive, so I don't want to fix it.
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list