[PATCH] tee: optee: add invoke_fn tracepoints
Jisheng Zhang
Jisheng.Zhang at synaptics.com
Thu Mar 25 03:50:43 GMT 2021
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:53:13 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 07:48:53 -0700
> Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:34:07AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:44:09PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > Add tracepoints to retrieve information about the invoke_fn. This would
> > > > help to measure how many invoke_fn are triggered and how long it takes
> > > > to complete one invoke_fn call.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang at synaptics.com>
> > >
> > > arm64:defconfig:
> > >
> > > make-arm64 -j drivers/tee/optee/call.o
> > > CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> > > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > > CC drivers/tee/optee/call.o
> > > In file included from drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:67,
> > > from drivers/tee/optee/call.c:18:
> > > ./include/trace/define_trace.h:95:42: fatal error: ./optee_trace.h: No such file or directory
> > > 95 | #include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE)
> > > | ^
> > > compilation terminated.
Interesting, I always build linux kernel with "O=", didn't see such build error
and IIRC, we didn't receive any lkp robot build error report.
My steps are:
mkdir /tmp/test
make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- O=/tmp/test defconfig
make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- O=/tmp/test drivers/tee/optee/
Today, I tried to build the linux kernel w/o "O=...", I reproduced this error!
This is the first time I saw "O=" make a different behavior.
I'll send out a patch to fix it.
Thanks
> > >
> >
> > The problem also affects arm:imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
> >
>
> I think it affects everything. The problem is that the
> drivers/tee/optee/Makefile needs to be updated with:
>
> CFLAGS_call.o := -I$(src)
>
> otherwise the compiler wont know how to find the path to optee_tree.h.
>
> This is described in:
>
> samples/trace_events/Makefile
Thank Steven for pointing this out.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list