[PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Generate final CTR_EL0 value when running in Protected mode
Quentin Perret
qperret at google.com
Mon Mar 22 17:40:40 GMT 2021
Hey Marc,
On Monday 22 Mar 2021 at 16:48:27 (+0000), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In protected mode, late CPUs are not allowed to boot (enforced by
> the PSCI relay). We can thus specialise the read_ctr macro to
> always return a pre-computed, sanitised value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> index fb651c1f26e9..1a4cee7eb3c9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -270,12 +270,21 @@ alternative_endif
> * provide the system wide safe value from arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0.sys_val
> */
> .macro read_ctr, reg
> +#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
> alternative_if_not ARM64_MISMATCHED_CACHE_TYPE
> mrs \reg, ctr_el0 // read CTR
> nop
> alternative_else
> ldr_l \reg, arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 + ARM64_FTR_SYSVAL
> alternative_endif
> +#else
> +alternative_cb kvm_compute_final_ctr_el0
> + movz \reg, #0
> + movk \reg, #0, lsl #16
> + movk \reg, #0, lsl #32
> + movk \reg, #0, lsl #48
> +alternative_cb_end
> +#endif
> .endm
So, FWIW, if we wanted to make _this_ macro BUG in non-protected mode
(and drop patch 01), I think we could do something like:
alternative_cb kvm_compute_final_ctr_el0
movz \reg, #0
ASM_BUG()
nop
nop
alternative_cb_end
and then make kvm_compute_final_ctr_el0() check that we're in protected
mode before patching. That would be marginally better as that would
cover _all_ users of read_ctr and not just __flush_dcache_area, but that
first movz is a bit yuck (but necessary to keep generate_mov_q() happy I
think?), so I'll leave the decision to you.
No objection from me for the current implementation, and if you decide to
go with it:
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com>
Thanks,
Quentin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list