arm64 syzbot instances
Peter Maydell
peter.maydell at linaro.org
Mon Mar 22 16:49:24 GMT 2021
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 16:36, John Garry <john.garry at huawei.com> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> There's apparently a bit in the PCI spec that reads:
> >> The host bus bridge, in PC compatible systems, must return all
> >> 1's on a read transaction and discard data on a write transaction
> >> when terminated with Master-Abort.
> >>
> >> which obviously applies only to "PC compatible systems".
> >
> > Right. As far as I can tell, all ARMv8 and most ARMv7 based SoCs
> > do this to be more compatible with PC style operating systems like
> > Linux, but you are right that the specification here does not
> > mandate that, and the older ARMv5 SoCs seem to be compliant
> > as well based on this.
> >> TBH I'm having difficulty seeing why the kernel should be doing
> >> this at all, though. The device tree tells you you have a PCI
> >> controller; PCI supports enumeration of devices; you know exactly
> >> where everything is mapped because the BARs tell you that.
> >> I don't see anything that justifies the kernel in randomly
> >> dereferencing areas of the IO or memory windows where it hasn't
> >> mapped anything.
>
> BIOS has described a CPU-addressable PIO region in the PCI hostbridge,
> and the kernel has mapped it:
>
> [ 3.974309][ T1] pci-host-generic 4010000000.pcie: IO
> 0x003eff0000..0x003effffff -> 0x0000000000
>
> So I don't see why any accesses there should fault.
As requested above, do you have the PCI spec reference for
why the PIO region is supposed to do -1/discard for parts of
the PIO region where the kernel hasn't mapped any devices ?
For classic PCI, at least, the spec does not seem to mandate it.
thanks
-- PMM
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list