[PATCH v2 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux != 0
Hawa, Hanna
hhhawa at amazon.com
Wed Mar 17 19:35:19 GMT 2021
On 3/17/2021 2:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:24 PM Hanna Hawa <hhhawa at amazon.com> wrote:
>>
>> An SError was detected when trying to print the supported pins in a
>
> What SError is?
System error:
[ 24.257831] SError Interrupt on CPU0, code 0xbf000002 -- SError
...
[ 24.257855] Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt
>
>> pinctrl device which supports multiple pins per register. This change
>> fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when
>> bits_per_mux != 0. In addition move offset calculation and pin offset in
>
> '!= 0' -> 'is not zero'
Will be fixed.
>
>> register to common function.
>
> Fixes tag?
Sure, will be added.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa at amazon.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
>> index f3394517cb2e..434f90c8b1b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
>> @@ -270,20 +270,53 @@ static void __maybe_unused pcs_writel(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg)
>> writel(val, reg);
>> }
>>
>> +static unsigned int pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(struct pcs_device *pcs,
>> + unsigned int pin)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int offset, mux_bytes;
>
> Offset can be replaced by direct return statements.
Ack.
>
>> + mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE;
>> +
>> + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) {
>> + unsigned int pin_offset_bytes;
>> +
>> + pin_offset_bytes = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE;
>> + offset = (pin_offset_bytes / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes;
>> + } else {
>> + offset = pin * mux_bytes;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return offset;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(struct pcs_device *pcs,
>> + unsigned int pin)
>> +{
>> + return ((pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin)) * pcs->bits_per_pin);
>
> Too many parentheses.
Will remove the extra parentheses.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> static void pcs_pin_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>> struct seq_file *s,
>> unsigned pin)
>> {
>> struct pcs_device *pcs;
>> - unsigned val, mux_bytes;
>> + unsigned int val;
>> unsigned long offset;
>> size_t pa;
>>
>> pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
>>
>> - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE;
>> - offset = pin * mux_bytes;
>> - val = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset);
>> + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, pin);
>> +
>> + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) {
>> + unsigned int pin_shift_in_reg = pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(pcs, pin);
>
>> + val = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset)
>> + & (pcs->fmask << pin_shift_in_reg);
>
> One line?
> At least move & to the upper line.
>
>> + } else {
>> + val = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset);
>
> It's the same as in above branch, why not
>
> val = read();
> if ()
> val &= fmask << _reg_get(...);
>
> ?
Agree, looks better
Thanks Andy, will send new patchset soon.
Thanks,
Hanna
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list