[PATCH 01/10] KVM: arm64: Provide KVM's own save/restore SVE primitives

Marc Zyngier maz at kernel.org
Tue Mar 16 12:17:08 GMT 2021


On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:31:46 +0000,
Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday 16 Mar 2021 at 10:13:03 (+0000), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/fpsimd.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/fpsimd.S
> > index 01f114aa47b0..e4010d1acb79 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/fpsimd.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/fpsimd.S
> > @@ -19,3 +19,13 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__fpsimd_restore_state)
> >  	fpsimd_restore	x0, 1
> >  	ret
> >  SYM_FUNC_END(__fpsimd_restore_state)
> > +
> > +SYM_FUNC_START(__sve_restore_state)
> > +	sve_load 0, x1, x2, 3, x4
> > +	ret
> > +SYM_FUNC_END(__sve_restore_state)
> 
> Nit: maybe this could be named __sve_load_state() for consistency with
> the EL1 version?

Well, we already have the discrepancy for fpsimd in the same file, so
I opted for another kind of consistency...

> 
> > +SYM_FUNC_START(__sve_save_state)
> > +	sve_save 0, x1, 2
> > +	ret
> > +SYM_FUNC_END(__sve_restore_state)
> 
> SYM_FUNC_END(__sve_save_state) here?

Yup, good catch.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list