[PATCH] KVM: arm64: Ensure I-cache isolation between vcpus of a same VM
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Tue Mar 9 14:38:42 GMT 2021
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 01:26:46PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 04:45:05PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > It recently became apparent that the ARMv8 architecture has interesting
> > rules regarding attributes being used when fetching instructions
> > if the MMU is off at Stage-1.
> >
> > In this situation, the CPU is allowed to fetch from the PoC and
> > allocate into the I-cache (unless the memory is mapped with
> > the XN attribute at Stage-2).
> >
> > If we transpose this to vcpus sharing a single physical CPU,
> > it is possible for a vcpu running with its MMU off to influence
> > another vcpu running with its MMU on, as the latter is expected to
> > fetch from the PoU (and self-patching code doesn't flush below that
> > level).
> >
> > In order to solve this, reuse the vcpu-private TLB invalidation
> > code to apply the same policy to the I-cache, nuking it every time
> > the vcpu runs on a physical CPU that ran another vcpu of the same
> > VM in the past.
> >
> > This involve renaming __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid() to
> > __kvm_flush_cpu_context(), and inserting a local i-cache invalidation
> > there.
> >
> > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 4 ++--
> > arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 7 ++++++-
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 6 +++---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c | 3 ++-
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c | 3 ++-
> > 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Since the FWB discussion doesn't affect the correctness of this patch:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
I agree. We can optimise it later for FWB.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list