[PATCH] KVM: arm64: Cap default IPA size to the host's own size
Andrew Jones
drjones at redhat.com
Tue Mar 9 13:20:21 GMT 2021
Hi Marc,
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 05:46:43PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> KVM/arm64 has forever used a 40bit default IPA space, partially
> due to its 32bit heritage (where the only choice is 40bit).
>
> However, there are implementations in the wild that have a *cough*
> much smaller *cough* IPA space, which leads to a misprogramming of
> VTCR_EL2, and a guest that is stuck on its first memory access
> if userspace dares to ask for the default IPA setting (which most
> VMMs do).
>
> Instead, cap the default IPA size to what the host can actually
> do, and spit out a one-off message on the console. The boot warning
> is turned into a more meaningfull message, and the new behaviour
> is also documented.
>
> Although this is a userspace ABI change, it doesn't really change
> much for userspace:
>
> - the guest couldn't run before this change, while it now has
> a chance to if the memory range fits the reduced IPA space
>
> - a memory slot that was accepted because it did fit the default
> IPA space but didn't fit the HW constraints is now properly
> rejected
I'm not sure deferring the misconfiguration error until memslot
request time is better than just failing to create a VM. If
userspace doesn't use KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_IPA_SIZE to determine the
limit (which it hasn't been obliged to do) and it is able to
successfully create a VM, then it will assume up to 40-bit IPAs
are supported. Later, when it tries to add memslots and fails
it may be confused, especially if that later is much, much later
with memory hotplug.
>
> The other thing that's left doing is to convince userspace to
> actually use the IPA space setting instead of relying on the
> antiquated default.
Failing to create any VM which hasn't selected a valid IPA limit
should be pretty convincing :-)
Thanks,
drew
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list