Patch "arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on early IORT scan" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Sun Mar 7 15:25:45 GMT 2021
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on early IORT scan
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-early-iort-scan.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable at vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo at baz Sun Mar 7 04:22:37 PM CET 2021
From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng at huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:33:18 +0800
Subject: arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on early IORT scan
To: <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>, <catalin.marinas at arm.com>, <will at kernel.org>, <akpm at linux-foundation.org>, <nsaenzjulienne at suse.de>, <paul.walmsley at sifive.com>, <palmer at dabbelt.com>, <aou at eecs.berkeley.edu>, <rppt at kernel.org>, <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>, <guohanjun at huawei.com>, <sudeep.holla at arm.com>, <rjw at rjwysocki.net>, <lenb at kernel.org>, <song.bao.hua at hisilicon.com>, <ardb at kernel.org>, <anshuman.khandual at arm.com>, <bhelgaas at google.com>, <guro at fb.com>, <robh+dt at kernel.org>
Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>, <frowand.list at gmail.com>, <devicetree at vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm at kvack.org>, <linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org>, <jingxiangfeng at huawei.com>, <wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton at arm.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
Message-ID: <20210303073319.2215839-7-jingxiangfeng at huawei.com>
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
commit 2b8652936f0ca9ca2e6c984ae76c7bfcda1b3f22 upstream
We recently introduced a 1 GB sized ZONE_DMA to cater for platforms
incorporating masters that can address less than 32 bits of DMA, in
particular the Raspberry Pi 4, which has 4 or 8 GB of DRAM, but has
peripherals that can only address up to 1 GB (and its PCIe host
bridge can only access the bottom 3 GB)
Instructing the DMA layer about these limitations is straight-forward,
even though we had to fix some issues regarding memory limits set in
the IORT for named components, and regarding the handling of ACPI _DMA
methods. However, the DMA layer also needs to be able to allocate
memory that is guaranteed to meet those DMA constraints, for bounce
buffering as well as allocating the backing for consistent mappings.
This is why the 1 GB ZONE_DMA was introduced recently. Unfortunately,
it turns out the having a 1 GB ZONE_DMA as well as a ZONE_DMA32 causes
problems with kdump, and potentially in other places where allocations
cannot cross zone boundaries. Therefore, we should avoid having two
separate DMA zones when possible.
So let's do an early scan of the IORT, and only create the ZONE_DMA
if we encounter any devices that need it. This puts the burden on
the firmware to describe such limitations in the IORT, which may be
redundant (and less precise) if _DMA methods are also being provided.
However, it should be noted that this situation is highly unusual for
arm64 ACPI machines. Also, the DMA subsystem still gives precedence to
the _DMA method if implemented, and so we will not lose the ability to
perform streaming DMA outside the ZONE_DMA if the _DMA method permits
it.
[nsaenz: unified implementation with DT's counterpart]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne at suse.de>
Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton at arm.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun at huawei.com>
Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton at arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne at suse.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun at huawei.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual at arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119175400.9995-7-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng at huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 5 +++-
drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/acpi_iort.h | 4 +++
3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/kexec.h>
#include <linux/crash_dump.h>
#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
+#include <linux/acpi_iort.h>
#include <asm/boot.h>
#include <asm/fixmap.h>
@@ -186,11 +187,13 @@ static phys_addr_t __init max_zone_phys(
static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
{
unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0};
+ unsigned int __maybe_unused acpi_zone_dma_bits;
unsigned int __maybe_unused dt_zone_dma_bits;
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
+ acpi_zone_dma_bits = fls64(acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address());
dt_zone_dma_bits = fls64(of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(NULL));
- zone_dma_bits = min(32U, dt_zone_dma_bits);
+ zone_dma_bits = min3(32U, dt_zone_dma_bits, acpi_zone_dma_bits);
arm64_dma_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(zone_dma_bits);
max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
#endif
--- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
@@ -1730,3 +1730,58 @@ void __init acpi_iort_init(void)
iort_init_platform_devices();
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
+/*
+ * Extract the highest CPU physical address accessible to all DMA masters in
+ * the system. PHYS_ADDR_MAX is returned when no constrained device is found.
+ */
+phys_addr_t __init acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void)
+{
+ phys_addr_t limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
+ struct acpi_iort_node *node, *end;
+ struct acpi_table_iort *iort;
+ acpi_status status;
+ int i;
+
+ if (acpi_disabled)
+ return limit;
+
+ status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_IORT, 0,
+ (struct acpi_table_header **)&iort);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return limit;
+
+ node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort, iort->node_offset);
+ end = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort, iort->header.length);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < iort->node_count; i++) {
+ if (node >= end)
+ break;
+
+ switch (node->type) {
+ struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
+ struct acpi_iort_root_complex *rc;
+ phys_addr_t local_limit;
+
+ case ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT:
+ ncomp = (struct acpi_iort_named_component *)node->node_data;
+ local_limit = DMA_BIT_MASK(ncomp->memory_address_limit);
+ limit = min_not_zero(limit, local_limit);
+ break;
+
+ case ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX:
+ if (node->revision < 1)
+ break;
+
+ rc = (struct acpi_iort_root_complex *)node->node_data;
+ local_limit = DMA_BIT_MASK(rc->memory_address_limit);
+ limit = min_not_zero(limit, local_limit);
+ break;
+ }
+ node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, node, node->length);
+ }
+ acpi_put_table(&iort->header);
+ return limit;
+}
+#endif
--- a/include/linux/acpi_iort.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi_iort.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ void iort_dma_setup(struct device *dev,
const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure_id(struct device *dev,
const u32 *id_in);
int iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head);
+phys_addr_t acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void);
#else
static inline void acpi_iort_init(void) { }
static inline u32 iort_msi_map_id(struct device *dev, u32 id)
@@ -55,6 +56,9 @@ static inline const struct iommu_ops *io
static inline
int iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head)
{ return 0; }
+
+static inline phys_addr_t acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void)
+{ return PHYS_ADDR_MAX; }
#endif
#endif /* __ACPI_IORT_H__ */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jingxiangfeng at huawei.com are
queue-5.10/of-unittest-add-test-for-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
queue-5.10/mm-remove-examples-from-enum-zone_type-comment.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-devicetree-s-dma-ranges.patch
queue-5.10/of-address-introduce-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-zone_dma_bits-initialization-into-zone_sizes_init.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-early-iort-scan.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-reserve_crashkernel-into-mem_init.patch
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list