[PATCH 2/2 v2] usb: gadget: s3c: Fix the error handling path in 's3c2410_udc_probe()'

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/03/2021 18:22, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 06/03/2021 à 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 06/03/2021 15:21, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> Some 'clk_prepare_enable()' and 'clk_get()' must be undone in the error
>>> handling path of the probe function, as already done in the remove
>>> function.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 3fc154b6b813 ("USB Gadget driver for Samsung s3c2410 ARM SoC")
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet at wanadoo.fr>
>>> ---
>>> v2: Fix a stupid error in the hash in Fixes:
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/s3c2410_udc.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Do not ignore received tags but add them before sending a new version of patch.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/36ef897b-aedc-fcc3-89c8-c602d9733a9b@canonical.com/T/#t
>>
>> Also somehow your 2nd patch is not in-reply to first one. Don't change
>> the settings of sending patches. git format-patch and
>> git send-email default settings are correct. Look here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/
>> Only your patches are not threaded.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> Hi,
> 
> sorry for missing the typo in the first patch.
> 
> For your other comments above, however, I use standard settings only.
> My patches are generated by commands like:
>     git format-patch -2
> 
> I use cover letter only if it looks useful. In such a case, I use:
>     git format-patch --thread --cover-letter -2
> 
> I've never seen that threading series was the rule and/or that cover 
> letters were a must have. If I'm wrong, sorry, I was not aware of that.

The cover letter is not needed. The threading was missing which is a
default so you had to configure it to that.


Best regards,
Krzysztof