[PATCH 1/5] perf metricgroup: Support printing metrics for arm64
John Garry
john.garry at huawei.com
Fri Mar 5 11:06:58 GMT 2021
Hi Jirka,
>> - struct pmu_events_map *map = perf_pmu__find_map(NULL);
>> + struct pmu_events_map *map = find_cpumap();
> so this is just for arm at the moment right?
>
Yes - but to be more accurate, arm64.
At the moment, from the archs which use pmu-events, only arm64 and nds32
have versions of get_cpuid_str() which require a non-NULL pmu argument.
But then apparently nds32 only supports a single CPU, so this issue of
heterogeneous CPUs should not be a concern there :)
> could we rather make this arch specific code, so we don't need
> to do the scanning on archs where this is not needed?
>
> like marking perf_pmu__find_map as __weak and add arm specific
> version?
Well I was thinking that this code should not be in metricgroup.c anyway.
So there is code which is common in current perf_pmu__find_map() for all
archs.
I could factor that out into a common function, below. Just a bit
worried about perf_pmu__find_map() and perf_pmu__find_pmu_map() being
confused.
Here's how that would look:
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
#include "../../util/cpumap.h"
#include "../../util/pmu.h"
struct pmu_events_map *perf_pmu__find_map(void)
{
struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmu__find("armv8_pmuv3_0");
if (!pmu || !pmu->cpus || pmu->cpus->nr != cpu__max_cpu())
return NULL;
return perf_pmu__find_pmu_map(pmu);
}
And:
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
index 26c990e32378..312164ce9299 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static int metricgroup__print_sys_event_iter(struct
pmu_event *pe, void *data)
void metricgroup__print(bool metrics, bool metricgroups, char *filter,
bool raw, bool details)
{
- struct pmu_events_map *map = perf_pmu__find_map(NULL);
+ struct pmu_events_map *map = perf_pmu__find_map();
struct pmu_event *pe;
int i;
struct rblist groups;
@@ -1253,8 +1253,7 @@ int metricgroup__parse_groups(const struct option
*opt,
struct rblist *metric_events)
{
struct evlist *perf_evlist = *(struct evlist **)opt->value;
- struct pmu_events_map *map = perf_pmu__find_map(NULL);
-
+ struct pmu_events_map *map = perf_pmu__find_map();
return parse_groups(perf_evlist, str, metric_no_group,
metric_no_merge, NULL, metric_events, map);
@@ -1273,7 +1272,7 @@ int metricgroup__parse_groups_test(struct evlist
*evlist,
bool metricgroup__has_metric(const char *metric)
{
- struct pmu_events_map *map = perf_pmu__find_map(NULL);
+ struct pmu_events_map *map = perf_pmu__find_map();
struct pmu_event *pe;
int i;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index 44ef28302fc7..d49bf20b6058 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static char *perf_pmu__getcpuid(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
return cpuid;
}
-struct pmu_events_map *perf_pmu__find_map(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
+struct pmu_events_map *perf_pmu__find_pmu_map(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
{
struct pmu_events_map *map;
char *cpuid = perf_pmu__getcpuid(pmu);
@@ -717,6 +717,11 @@ struct pmu_events_map *perf_pmu__find_map(struct
perf_pmu *pmu)
return map;
}
+struct pmu_events_map *__weak perf_pmu__find_map(void)
+{
+ return perf_pmu__find_pmu_map(NULL);
+}
+
bool pmu_uncore_alias_match(const char *pmu_name, const char *name)
{
char *tmp = NULL, *tok, *str;
@@ -805,7 +810,7 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head
*head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
{
struct pmu_events_map *map;
- map = perf_pmu__find_map(pmu);
+ map = perf_pmu__find_pmu_map(pmu);
if (!map)
return;
Thoughts?
Thanks!
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list