[PATCH v3 12/32] KVM: arm64: Introduce a Hyp buddy page allocator
Will Deacon
will at kernel.org
Thu Mar 4 15:30:36 GMT 2021
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 02:59:42PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> When memory protection is enabled, the hyp code will require a basic
> form of memory management in order to allocate and free memory pages at
> EL2. This is needed for various use-cases, including the creation of hyp
> mappings or the allocation of stage 2 page tables.
>
> To address these use-case, introduce a simple memory allocator in the
> hyp code. The allocator is designed as a conventional 'buddy allocator',
> working with a page granularity. It allows to allocate and free
> physically contiguous pages from memory 'pools', with a guaranteed order
> alignment in the PA space. Each page in a memory pool is associated
> with a struct hyp_page which holds the page's metadata, including its
> refcount, as well as its current order, hence mimicking the kernel's
> buddy system in the GFP infrastructure. The hyp_page metadata are made
> accessible through a hyp_vmemmap, following the concept of
> SPARSE_VMEMMAP in the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/gfp.h | 55 +++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/memory.h | 28 ++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/gfp.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c
[...]
> +static void __hyp_attach_page(struct hyp_pool *pool,
> + struct hyp_page *p)
> +{
> + unsigned int order = p->order;
> + struct hyp_page *buddy;
> +
> + memset(hyp_page_to_virt(p), 0, PAGE_SIZE << p->order);
> +
> + /*
> + * Only the first struct hyp_page of a high-order page (otherwise known
> + * as the 'head') should have p->order set. The non-head pages should
> + * have p->order = HYP_NO_ORDER. Here @p may no longer be the head
> + * after coallescing, so make sure to mark it HYP_NO_ORDER proactively.
> + */
> + p->order = HYP_NO_ORDER;
> + for (; (order + 1) < pool->max_order; order++) {
> + buddy = __find_buddy_avail(pool, p, order);
> + if (!buddy)
> + break;
> +
> + /* Take the buddy out of its list, and coallesce with @p */
> + list_del_init(&buddy->node);
> + buddy->order = HYP_NO_ORDER;
> + p = (p < buddy) ? p : buddy;
nit: this is min()
> + }
> +
> + /* Mark the new head, and insert it */
> + p->order = order;
> + list_add_tail(&p->node, &pool->free_area[order]);
> +}
> +
> +static void hyp_attach_page(struct hyp_page *p)
> +{
> + struct hyp_pool *pool = hyp_page_to_pool(p);
> +
> + hyp_spin_lock(&pool->lock);
> + __hyp_attach_page(pool, p);
> + hyp_spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static struct hyp_page *__hyp_extract_page(struct hyp_pool *pool,
> + struct hyp_page *p,
> + unsigned int order)
> +{
> + struct hyp_page *buddy;
> +
> + list_del_init(&p->node);
> + while (p->order > order) {
> + /*
> + * The buddy of order n - 1 currently has HYP_NO_ORDER as it
> + * is covered by a higher-level page (whose head is @p). Use
> + * __find_buddy_nocheck() to find it and inject it in the
> + * free_list[n - 1], effectively splitting @p in half.
> + */
> + p->order--;
> + buddy = __find_buddy_nocheck(pool, p, p->order);
> + buddy->order = p->order;
> + list_add_tail(&buddy->node, &pool->free_area[buddy->order]);
> + }
> +
> + return p;
> +}
> +
> +void hyp_put_page(void *addr)
> +{
> + struct hyp_page *p = hyp_virt_to_page(addr);
> +
> + if (hyp_page_ref_dec_and_test(p))
> + hyp_attach_page(p);
> +}
> +
> +void hyp_get_page(void *addr)
> +{
> + struct hyp_page *p = hyp_virt_to_page(addr);
> +
> + hyp_page_ref_inc(p);
> +}
> +
> +void *hyp_alloc_pages(struct hyp_pool *pool, unsigned int order)
> +{
> + unsigned int i = order;
> + struct hyp_page *p;
> +
> + hyp_spin_lock(&pool->lock);
> +
> + /* Look for a high-enough-order page */
> + while (i < pool->max_order && list_empty(&pool->free_area[i]))
> + i++;
> + if (i >= pool->max_order) {
> + hyp_spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Extract it from the tree at the right order */
> + p = list_first_entry(&pool->free_area[i], struct hyp_page, node);
> + p = __hyp_extract_page(pool, p, order);
> +
> + hyp_spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
> + hyp_page_ref_inc(p);
I find this a little scary, as we momentarily drop the lock. It think
it's ok because the reference count on the page must be 0 at this point,
but actually then I think it would be clearer to have a
hyp_page_ref_init() function which could take the lock, check that the
refcount is indeed 0 and then set it to 1.
What do you think?
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list