[PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rng: bcm2835: document reset support

[Álvaro Fernández Rojas]

> El 4 mar 2021, a las 13:07, Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne at suse.de> escribió:
> 
> Hi Alvaro,
> 
> On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 18:00 +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>> Some devices may need to perform a reset before using the RNG, such as the
>> BCM6368.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  v3: make resets required if brcm,bcm6368-rng.
>>  v2: document reset support.
>> 
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml   | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml
>> index c147900f9041..11c23e1f6988 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml
>> @@ -37,6 +37,21 @@ required:
>>  
>> 
>>  additionalProperties: false
> 
> I can't claim I fully understand all the meta stuff in shemas, so I generally
> just follow the patterns already available out there.

Well, that makes two of us :).

> That said, shoudln't this be at the end, just before the examples?

I don’t know but I can move it there ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

> Maybe the cause of that odd warning
> you got there?

Which odd warning?
I don’t get any warnings when running (or at least warnings related to rig, because I get warnings related to other yamls):
make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml

> 
>> +if:
>> +  properties:
>> +    compatible:
>> +      enum:
>> +        - brcm,bcm6368-rng
>> +then:
>> +  properties:
>> +    resets:
>> +      maxItems: 1
>> +  required:
>> +    - resets
> 
> I belive you can't really make a property required when the bindings for
> 'brcm,bcm6368-rng' were already defined. This will break the schema for those
> otherwise correct devicetrees.

Why not?
Wouldn’t just be required for brcm,bcm6368-rng?

Anyway, I can omit this, since it would be the same for clocks and those aren’t required either.

> 
>> +else:
>> +  properties:
>> +    resets: false
>> +
>>  examples:
>>    - |
>>      rng at 7e104000 {
>> @@ -58,4 +73,6 @@ examples:
>>  
>> 
>>          clocks = <&periph_clk 18>;
>>          clock-names = "ipsec";
>> +
>> +        resets = <&periph_rst 4>;
>>      };
> 
> Regards,
> Nicolas

Best regards,
Álvaro.