[PATCH] recordmcount: avoid using ABS symbol as reference
Mark-PK Tsai
mark-pk.tsai at mediatek.com
Mon Jun 7 00:42:58 PDT 2021
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 08:59, Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai at mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 04:42, Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai at mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Avoid using ABS symbol, which won't be relocate, as reference.
> > > >
> > > > On arm64 platform, if there's shndx equals SHN_ABS(0xfff1).
> > > >
> > > > Section Headers:
> > > > [Nr] Name Type Address Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al
> > > > [65521] .text.n_tty_receive_buf PROGBITS 0000000000000000 3cdab520 000054 00 AX 0 0 4
> > > > [65522] .rela.text.n_tty_receive_buf RELA 0000000000000000 3cdab578 000030 18 I 152076 65521 8
> > > >
> > >
> > > A RELA section's r_info field points to the section to which it
> > > applies. This is why in the example above section #65522 points to
> > > section #65521. This has nothing to do with the numerical value of
> > > SHN_ABS.
> >
> > If the r_info of RELA section is 65521(0xfff1),
Oh sorry, I mean sh_info here.
> > find_secsym_ndx() will use it to find the base symbol.
> >
>
> But what does that have to do with the sh_info field of the RELA
> section's Elf_Shdr struct? IOW, what is the relevance of section
> #65521 here?
>
So what I mean is the problem occur if the sh_info of a RELA section
is #65521.
> > And in the symbol search loop in find_secsym_ndx(), get_symindex will
> > return 0xfff1 if the symbol is in ABS section.
> >
> > In this case, find_secsym_ndx() will return a absolute symbol as
> > base, which won't be relocate, if an ABS symbol is found before the
> > real symbol in section 65521.
> >
>
> I see your point here.
>
> > >
> > > > find_secsym_ndx, which use r_info in rela section to find the reference
sh_info.
> > > > symbol, may take ABS symbol as base.
> > > >
> > > > Symbol table '.symtab' contains 453285 entries:
> > > > Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
> > > > 6: 0000000000000002 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT ABS section_count
> > > >
> > > > Which cause an invalid address in __mcount_loc.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Could you give a better account of the error you are trying to address?
> > >
> > > Also, arm64 no longer defines a section_count symbol (since v5.11), so
> > > please make sure that the diagnostics of the issue you are addressing
> > > are accurate for mainline.
> > >
> >
> > My kernel version is 5.4.61.
> > But as I explained, I suppose mainline also have this issue.
> >
>
> Mainline is what we work on. So please base your changes (and your
> commit log) on mainline.
>
I understand it.
But the platform I can reproduce the problem is only support to 5.4 LTS now.
And port it to the latest mainline kernel have much more work to do, can I just
keep this commit log? Or just remove the example I posted in the commit messsage?
>
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai at mediatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > scripts/recordmcount.h | 4 ++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/scripts/recordmcount.h b/scripts/recordmcount.h
> > > > index f9b19524da11..9b69167fb7ff 100644
> > > > --- a/scripts/recordmcount.h
> > > > +++ b/scripts/recordmcount.h
> > > > @@ -526,6 +526,10 @@ static int find_secsym_ndx(unsigned const txtndx,
> > > > for (symp = sym0, t = nsym; t; --t, ++symp) {
> > > > unsigned int const st_bind = ELF_ST_BIND(symp->st_info);
> > > >
> > > > + /* avoid absolute symbols */
> > > > + if (symp->st_shndx == SHN_ABS)
> > > > + continue;
> > > > +
> > > > if (txtndx == get_symindex(symp, symtab, symtab_shndx)
> > > > /* avoid STB_WEAK */
> > > > && (STB_LOCAL == st_bind || STB_GLOBAL == st_bind)) {
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list