[PATCH 13/14] KVM: arm64: Restrict hyp stage-1 manipulation in protected mode
Fuad Tabba
tabba at google.com
Wed Jul 21 03:45:53 PDT 2021
Hi Quentin,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:48 AM Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com> wrote:
>
> The host kernel is currently able to change EL2 stage-1 mappings without
> restrictions thanks to the __pkvm_create_mappings() hypercall. But in a
> world where the host is no longer part of the TCB, this clearly poses a
> problem.
>
> To fix this, introduce a new hypercall to allow the host to share a
> range of physical memory with the hypervisor, and remove the
> __pkvm_create_mappings() variant. The new hypercall implements
> ownership and permission checks before allowing the sharing operation,
> and it annotates the shared pages in the hypervisor stage-1 and host
> stage-2 page-tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h | 2 -
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 12 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 14 ++-
> 7 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> index 9f0bf2109be7..78db818ae2c9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
> #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_save_aprs 13
> #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_restore_aprs 14
> #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_init 15
> -#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_create_mappings 16
> +#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_host_share_hyp 16
> #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_create_private_mapping 17
> #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_cpu_set_vector 18
> #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_prot_finalize 19
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> index b39047463075..f37e4d3b831b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ extern struct host_kvm host_kvm;
>
> int __pkvm_prot_finalize(void);
> int __pkvm_mark_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
> +int __pkvm_host_share_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
>
> int host_stage2_idmap_locked(u64 start, u64 end, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> int kvm_host_prepare_stage2(void *pgt_pool_base);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h
> index c76d7136ed9b..c9a8f535212e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,6 @@ int hyp_back_vmemmap(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long size, phys_addr_t back);
> int pkvm_cpu_set_vector(enum arm64_hyp_spectre_vector slot);
> int pkvm_create_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> int pkvm_create_mappings_locked(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> -int __pkvm_create_mappings(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> - unsigned long phys, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> unsigned long __pkvm_create_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> index 1632f001f4ed..f05ecbd382d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> @@ -140,14 +140,12 @@ static void handle___pkvm_cpu_set_vector(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = pkvm_cpu_set_vector(slot);
> }
>
> -static void handle___pkvm_create_mappings(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> +static void handle___pkvm_host_share_hyp(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> {
> - DECLARE_REG(unsigned long, start, host_ctxt, 1);
> - DECLARE_REG(unsigned long, size, host_ctxt, 2);
> - DECLARE_REG(unsigned long, phys, host_ctxt, 3);
> - DECLARE_REG(enum kvm_pgtable_prot, prot, host_ctxt, 4);
> + DECLARE_REG(phys_addr_t, start, host_ctxt, 1);
> + DECLARE_REG(phys_addr_t, end, host_ctxt, 2);
>
> - cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = __pkvm_create_mappings(start, size, phys, prot);
> + cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = __pkvm_host_share_hyp(start, end);
> }
>
> static void handle___pkvm_create_private_mapping(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> @@ -193,7 +191,7 @@ static const hcall_t host_hcall[] = {
> HANDLE_FUNC(__vgic_v3_restore_aprs),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_init),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_cpu_set_vector),
> - HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_create_mappings),
> + HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_host_share_hyp),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_create_private_mapping),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_prot_finalize),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_mark_hyp),
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> index 6f28edf58407..20b3cb3fdc67 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,111 @@ static int host_stage2_idmap(u64 addr)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int hyp_range_is_shared_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
> + kvm_pte_t *ptep,
> + enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flag,
> + void * const arg)
> +{
> + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> + kvm_pte_t pte = *ptep;
> +
> + if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + prot = kvm_pgtable_hyp_pte_prot(pte);
> + if (!prot)
> + return -EPERM;
nit: is this check necessary?
> + /* Check that the page has been shared with the hypervisor before */
> + if (prot != (PAGE_HYP | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_SHARED | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_BORROWED))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hyp_range_is_shared(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> + .cb = hyp_range_is_shared_walker,
> + .flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> + };
> +
> + return kvm_pgtable_walk(&pkvm_pgtable, (u64)__hyp_va(start),
> + end - start, &walker);
> +}
> +
> +static int check_host_share_hyp_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
nit: It seems the convention is usually addr,size or start,end. Here
you're using addr,end.
> + kvm_pte_t *ptep,
> + enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flag,
> + void * const arg)
> +{
> + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> + kvm_pte_t pte = *ptep;
> +
> + /* If invalid, only allow to share pristine pages */
> + if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte))
> + return pte ? -EPERM : 0;
> +
> + prot = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte);
> + if (!prot)
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + /* Cannot share a page that is not owned */
> + if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_BORROWED)
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + /* Cannot share a page with restricted access */
> + if ((prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX) ^ KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX)
nit: isn't this clearer as
if ((prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX) != KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX)
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + /* Allow double-sharing (requires cross-checking the hyp stage-1) */
> + if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_SHARED)
> + return hyp_range_is_shared(addr, addr + 1);
Why addr+1, rather than end?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int check_host_share_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> + .cb = check_host_share_hyp_walker,
> + .flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> + };
> +
> + return kvm_pgtable_walk(&host_kvm.pgt, start, end - start, &walker);
> +}
> +
> +int __pkvm_host_share_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!range_is_memory(start, end))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + hyp_spin_lock(&host_kvm.lock);
> + hyp_spin_lock(&pkvm_pgd_lock);
> +
> + ret = check_host_share_hyp(start, end);
> + if (ret)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + prot = KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_SHARED;
> + ret = host_stage2_idmap_locked(start, end, prot);
Just for me to understand this better. The id mapping here, which
wasn't taking place before this patch, is for tracking, right?
Thanks,
/fuad
> + if (ret && ret != -EAGAIN)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + prot = PAGE_HYP | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_SHARED | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_BORROWED;
> + ret = pkvm_create_mappings_locked(__hyp_va(start), __hyp_va(end), prot);
> + /* XXX - undo host stage-2 changes if ret != 0 */
> +
> +unlock:
> + hyp_spin_unlock(&pkvm_pgd_lock);
> + hyp_spin_unlock(&host_kvm.lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int __pkvm_mark_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> {
> int ret;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c
> index dde22e2a322a..95f6c34a38ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c
> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ u64 __io_map_base;
> struct memblock_region hyp_memory[HYP_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS];
> unsigned int hyp_memblock_nr;
>
> -int __pkvm_create_mappings(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> - unsigned long phys, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> +static int __pkvm_create_mappings(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> + unsigned long phys, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> {
> int err;
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 0625bf2353c2..2158d1e00acd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -259,10 +259,8 @@ static int __create_hyp_mappings(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> {
> int err;
>
> - if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> - return kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_create_mappings,
> - start, size, phys, prot);
> - }
> + if (WARN_ON(!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()))
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> mutex_lock(&kvm_hyp_pgd_mutex);
> err = kvm_pgtable_hyp_map(hyp_pgtable, start, size, phys, prot);
> @@ -302,6 +300,14 @@ int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
> return 0;
>
> + if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> + if (WARN_ON(prot != PAGE_HYP))
> + return -EPERM;
> + return kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_share_hyp,
> + kvm_kaddr_to_phys(from),
> + kvm_kaddr_to_phys(to));
> + }
> +
> start = start & PAGE_MASK;
> end = PAGE_ALIGN(end);
>
> --
> 2.32.0.402.g57bb445576-goog
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list