[PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: can: flexcan: fix imx8mp compatbile

Joakim Zhang qiangqing.zhang at nxp.com
Thu Jul 15 04:44:28 PDT 2021


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dong Aisheng <dongas86 at gmail.com>
> Sent: 2021年7月15日 19:36
> To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang at nxp.com>; Aisheng Dong
> <aisheng.dong at nxp.com>; devicetree <devicetree at vger.kernel.org>;
> moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE
> <linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx at nxp.com>;
> Sascha Hauer <kernel at pengutronix.de>; Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>;
> Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>; linux-can at vger.kernel.org;
> netdev at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: can: flexcan: fix imx8mp compatbile
> 
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 7:07 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl at pengutronix.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 15.07.2021 11:00:07, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> > > > I checked with Joakim that the flexcan on MX8MP is derived from
> > > > MX6Q with extra ECC added. Maybe we should still keep it from HW point
> of view?
> > >
> > > Sorry, Aisheng, I double check the history, and get the below results:
> > >
> > > 8MP reuses 8QXP(8QM), except ECC_EN
> > > (ipv_flexcan3_syn_006/D_IP_FlexCAN3_SYN_057 which corresponds to
> > > version d_ip_flexcan3_syn.03.00.17.01)
> >
> > Also see commit message of:
> >
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore
> > .kernel.org%2Flinux-can%2F20200929211557.14153-2-qiangqing.zhang%40n
> xp
> > .com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cqiangqing.zhang%40nxp.com%7Cf5cd871
> e13b34e9
> >
> 5817b08d9478504af%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C
> 6376194
> >
> 58893680146%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIj
> oiV2luMz
> >
> IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=YwH3vD%2FtIol5
> OXPHPM
> > VbiVCLTC7gowOdIP3Ih1lBHh0%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > > I prefer to change the dtsi as Mac suggested if possible, shall I
> > > send a fix patch?
> >
> > Make it so!
> 
> Then should it be "fsl,imx8mp-flexcan", "fsl,imx8qxp-flexcan" rather than only
> drop "fsl,imx6q-flexcan"?

No, I will only use " fsl,imx8mp-flexcan" to avoid ECC impact.

Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> Regards
> Aisheng
> 
> >
> > regards,
> > Marc
> >
> > --
> > Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
> > Embedded Linux                   |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
> engutronix.de%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cqiangqing.zhang%40nxp.com%7Cf
> 5cd871e13b34e95817b08d9478504af%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c30163
> 5%7C0%7C1%7C637619458893680146%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWI
> joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3
> 000&sdata=soLd53hGDcxtF42AjJ7u5k9TT%2FsZt6TG%2Bljw4rvtdy4%3D&
> amp;reserved=0  |
> > Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
> > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list