[PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements
Alexandru Elisei
alexandru.elisei at arm.com
Wed Jul 14 08:48:07 PDT 2021
Hi Marc,
On 7/13/21 2:58 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> A number of the PMU sysregs expose reset values that are not in
> compliant with the architecture (set bits in the RES0 ranges,
> for example).
>
> This in turn has the effect that we need to pointlessly mask
> some register when using them.
>
> Let's start by making sure we don't have illegal values in the
> shadow registers at reset time. This affects all the registers
> that dedicate one bit per counter, the counters themselves,
> PMEVTYPERn_EL0 and PMSELR_EL0.
>
> Reported-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre at oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index f6f126eb6ac1..95ccb8f45409 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -603,6 +603,44 @@ static unsigned int pmu_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return REG_HIDDEN;
> }
>
> +static void reset_pmu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + u64 n, mask;
> +
> + /* No PMU available, any PMU reg may UNDEF... */
> + if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> + return;
> +
> + n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
Isn't this going to cause a lot of unnecessary traps with NV? Is that going to be
a problem? Because at the moment I can't think of an elegant way to avoid it,
other than special casing PMCR_EL0 in kvm_reset_sys_regs() and using here
__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0). Or, even better, using
kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu), since this is identical to what that function does.
> + n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> +
> + reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> +
> + mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
PMSWINC_EL0 has bit 31 RES0. Other than that, looked at all the PMU registers and
everything looks correct to me.
Thanks,
Alex
> + if (n)
> + mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
> +
> + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_pmevcntr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= GENMASK(31, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_pmevtyper(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK;
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_pmselr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ARMV8_PMU_COUNTER_MASK;
> +}
> +
> static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> {
> u64 pmcr, val;
> @@ -944,16 +982,18 @@ static bool access_pmuserenr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> trap_wcr, reset_wcr, 0, 0, get_wcr, set_wcr }
>
> #define PMU_SYS_REG(r) \
> - SYS_DESC(r), .reset = reset_unknown, .visibility = pmu_visibility
> + SYS_DESC(r), .reset = reset_pmu_reg, .visibility = pmu_visibility
>
> /* Macro to expand the PMEVCNTRn_EL0 register */
> #define PMU_PMEVCNTR_EL0(n) \
> { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMEVCNTRn_EL0(n)), \
> + .reset = reset_pmevcntr, \
> .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reg = (PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + n), }
>
> /* Macro to expand the PMEVTYPERn_EL0 register */
> #define PMU_PMEVTYPER_EL0(n) \
> { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMEVTYPERn_EL0(n)), \
> + .reset = reset_pmevtyper, \
> .access = access_pmu_evtyper, .reg = (PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + n), }
>
> static bool undef_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> @@ -1595,13 +1635,13 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMSWINC_EL0),
> .access = access_pmswinc, .reg = PMSWINC_EL0 },
> { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMSELR_EL0),
> - .access = access_pmselr, .reg = PMSELR_EL0 },
> + .access = access_pmselr, .reset = reset_pmselr, .reg = PMSELR_EL0 },
> { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCEID0_EL0),
> .access = access_pmceid, .reset = NULL },
> { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCEID1_EL0),
> .access = access_pmceid, .reset = NULL },
> { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCCNTR_EL0),
> - .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reg = PMCCNTR_EL0 },
> + .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reset = reset_unknown, .reg = PMCCNTR_EL0 },
> { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMXEVTYPER_EL0),
> .access = access_pmu_evtyper, .reset = NULL },
> { PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMXEVCNTR_EL0),
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list