[PATCH 4.4.y] arm: kprobes: Allow to handle reentered kprobe on single-stepping

[Xiaoming Ni]

On 2021/7/9 17:00, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Shaobo,
> 
> Thanks for backporting!
> Greg, it seems this patch can be applied to 4.9 too without any issue.
> 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-4.9.y&id=355a04fa1fc23c4fb1d16440e62d46a42691e96b

The v4.9 branch has been fixed.

Thanks
Xiaoming Ni



> Thank you,
> 
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:46:30 +0800
> Shaobo Huang <huangshaobo6 at huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
>>
>> commit f3fbd7ec62dec1528fb8044034e2885f2b257941 upstream
>>
>> This is arm port of commit 6a5022a56ac3 ("kprobes/x86: Allow to
>> handle reentered kprobe on single-stepping")
>>
>> Since the FIQ handlers can interrupt in the single stepping
>> (or preparing the single stepping, do_debug etc.), we should
>> consider a kprobe is hit in the NMI handler. Even in that
>> case, the kprobe is allowed to be reentered as same as the
>> kprobes hit in kprobe handlers
>> (KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE or KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE).
>>
>> The real issue will happen when a kprobe hit while another
>> reentered kprobe is processing (KPROBE_REENTER), because
>> we already consumed a saved-area for the previous kprobe.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy at linaro.org>
>> Fixes: 24ba613c9d6c ("ARM kprobes: core code")
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org #v2.6.25~v4.11
>> Signed-off-by: huangshaobo <huangshaobo6 at huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c
>> index 3eb018fa1a1f..c3362ddd6c4c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c
>> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>   			switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
>>   			case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
>>   			case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
>> +			case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
>>   				/* A pre- or post-handler probe got us here. */
>>   				kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
>>   				save_previous_kprobe(kcb);
>> @@ -278,6 +279,11 @@ void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>   				singlestep(p, regs, kcb);
>>   				restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
>>   				break;
>> +			case KPROBE_REENTER:
>> +				/* A nested probe was hit in FIQ, it is a BUG */
>> +				pr_warn("Unrecoverable kprobe detected at %p.\n",
>> +					p->addr);
>> +				/* fall through */
>>   			default:
>>   				/* impossible cases */
>>   				BUG();
>> -- 
>> 2.12.3
>>
> 
>