[PATCH] arm64: cache: Lower ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to 64 (L1_CACHE_BYTES)

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Tue 06 Jul 15:33 CDT 2021, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 7:15 PM Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana at protonmail.com> wrote:
> > > (the numactl command helps run this both on the 'big' and 'little'
> > > cores without running into migration)
> > >
> > > Arnd
> >
> > Here are the results:
> 
> Thanks, that was quick
> 
> > $ numactl -C 0 line -M 1M
> > 128
> > $ numactl -C 3 line -M 1M
> > 128
> > $ numactl -C 0 cache
> > L1 cache: 512 bytes 1.37 nanoseconds 64 linesize -1.00 parallelism
> > L2 cache: 24576 bytes 2.75 nanoseconds 64 linesize 5.06 parallelism
> > L3 cache: 131072 bytes 7.89 nanoseconds 64 linesize 3.85 parallelism
> > L4 cache: 524288 bytes 15.86 nanoseconds 128 linesize 3.48 parallelism
> > Memory latency: 145.93 nanoseconds 4.88 parallelism
> > $ numactl -C 3 cache
> > L1 cache: 24576 bytes 1.29 nanoseconds 64 linesize 5.00 parallelism
> > L2 cache: 1048576 bytes 8.60 nanoseconds 128 linesize 3.07 parallelism
> > Memory latency: 143.29 nanoseconds 5.37 parallelism
> 
> This is still somewhat inconclusive, but it does give some hope. The data that
> I found on random web sites was
> 
> - 32KB L1, 2MB/1MB L2 [1][2]
> - 16KB L1, 1.5MB L2 [3]
> - 32KB L1, 1MB/512KB L2 [4]
> 
> so none of the sizes really line up. My best guess is that the actual hierarchy
> 
> 1MB per-core L2 cache on the two big CPU, 512KB per-core L2 cache on
> the two little ones, but no shared L2 or L3. The older Krait had a 4KB L0
> cache, which could explain the 512-byte L1 output.
> 
> Can you rerun the the 'line' test with '-M 128K' to see if that confirms the 64
> byte L1 line size that the 'cache' test reported?

I can confirm that MSM8996, and a few derivatives, has 128 byte cache
lines.

Regards,
Bjorn