[PATCH v4 13/16] dt-bindings: arm: Add virtio transport for SCMI

[Cristian Marussi]

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 10:43:02AM +0200, Peter Hilber wrote:
> On 11.06.21 18:59, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > From: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin at opensynergy.com>
> > 
> > Document the properties for arm,scmi-virtio compatible nodes.
> > The backing virtio SCMI device is described in patch [1].
> > 
> > While doing that, make shmem property required only for pre-existing
> > mailbox and smc transports, since virtio-scmi does not need it.
> > 
> > [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202102/msg00018.html
> > 
> > CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> > CC: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin at opensynergy.com>
> > [ Peter: Adapted patch for submission to upstream. ]
> > Co-developed-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber at opensynergy.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber at opensynergy.com>
> > [ Cristian: converted to yaml format, moved shmen required property. ]
> > Co-developed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi at arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi at arm.com>
> > ---
> > v3 --> V4
> > - convertd to YAML
> > - make shmem required only for pre-existing mailbox and smc transport
> > - updated VirtIO specification patch message reference
> > - dropped virtio-mmio SCMI device example since really not pertinent to
> >    virtio-scmi dt bindings transport: it is not even referenced in SCMI
> >    virtio DT node since they are enumerated by VirtIO subsystem and there
> >    could be PCI based SCMI devices anyway.
> > ---
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 8 +++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > index cebf6ffe70d5..5c4c6782e052 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ properties:
> >         - description: SCMI compliant firmware with ARM SMC/HVC transport
> >           items:
> >             - const: arm,scmi-smc
> > +      - description: SCMI compliant firmware with SCMI Virtio transport.
> > +                     The virtio transport only supports a single device.
> > +        items:
> > +          - const: arm,scmi-virtio
> >     interrupts:
> >       description:
> > @@ -172,6 +176,7 @@ patternProperties:
> >         Each sub-node represents a protocol supported. If the platform
> >         supports a dedicated communication channel for a particular protocol,
> >         then the corresponding transport properties must be present.
> > +      The virtio transport does not support a dedicated communication channel.
> >       properties:
> >         reg:
> > @@ -195,7 +200,6 @@ patternProperties:
> >   required:
> >     - compatible
> > -  - shmem
> >   if:
> >     properties:
> > @@ -209,6 +213,7 @@ then:
> >     required:
> >       - mboxes
> > +    - shmem
> >   else:
> >     if:
> > @@ -219,6 +224,7 @@ else:
> >     then:
> >       required:
> >         - arm,smc-id
> > +      - shmem
> >   examples:
> >     - |
> > 
> 
> Maybe a minimal example for arm,scmi-virtio could be added, such as below:
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> index 5c4c6782e052..576faf970c1b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> @@ -344,4 +344,19 @@ examples:
>          };
>      };
> 
> +  - |
> +    firmware {
> +        scmi {
> +            compatible = "arm,scmi-virtio";
> +
> +            #address-cells = <1>;
> +            #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +            scmi_devpd2: protocol at 11 {
> +                reg = <0x11>;
> +                #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> +            };
> +        };
> +    };
> +

Not sure about this, I explicitly removed the arm,scmi-virtio example
because with the current bindings it won't really exemplify anything
really specific to the virtio transport if not the usage of the compatible
string, and moreover the mmio case is just a case, there could be PCI
based virtio SCMI device that would have even less to show here as an
example.

Thanks,
Cristian