[PATCH 1/2] perf/arm-cmn: Fix PMU instance naming
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Thu Jan 28 19:14:55 EST 2021
On 2021-01-28 20:14, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:12:43PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Although it's neat to avoid the suffix for the typical case of a
>> single PMU, it means systems with multiple CMN instances end up with
>> inconsistent naming. I think it also breaks perf tool's "uncore alias"
>> logic if the common instance prefix is also the full name of one.
>>
>> Avoid any surprises by not trying to be clever and simply numbering
>> every instance, even when it might technically prove redundant.
>>
>> Fixes: 0ba64770a2f2 ("perf: Add Arm CMN-600 PMU driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/admin-guide/perf/arm-cmn.rst | 2 +-
>> drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 13 ++++---------
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Hmm, so usually I'd push-back on changes like this because it's a
> user-visible change, however in this case we're talking about a pretty
> niche PMU and a relatively new driver so I think we should proceed. However,
> if anybody complains then we'll need to support them in one way or another.
Yeah, I'm kicking myself for not remembering about the aliasing thing
from the start - it came up tangentially from conversation with some
interested users the other day - so hopefully the practicality will
outweigh any possible early-adopter inconvenience.
Thanks,
Robin.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list