[PATCH v3 2/2] vfio/iommu_type1: Fix some sanity checks in detach group

[Keqian Zhu]

On 2021/1/28 7:46, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:26:35 +0800
> Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1 at huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> vfio_sanity_check_pfn_list() is used to check whether pfn_list and
>> notifier are empty when remove the external domain, so it makes a
>> wrong assumption that only external domain will use the pinning
>> interface.
>>
>> Now we apply the pfn_list check when a vfio_dma is removed and apply
>> the notifier check when all domains are removed.
>>
>> Fixes: a54eb55045ae ("vfio iommu type1: Add support for mediated devices")
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1 at huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 33 ++++++++++-----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index 161725395f2f..d8c10f508321 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -957,6 +957,7 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
>>  
>>  static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
>>  {
>> +	WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list));
>>  	vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, true);
>>  	vfio_unlink_dma(iommu, dma);
>>  	put_task_struct(dma->task);
>> @@ -2250,23 +2251,6 @@ static void vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void vfio_sanity_check_pfn_list(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>> -{
>> -	struct rb_node *n;
>> -
>> -	n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
>> -	for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>> -		struct vfio_dma *dma;
>> -
>> -		dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
>> -
>> -		if (WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list)))
>> -			break;
>> -	}
>> -	/* mdev vendor driver must unregister notifier */
>> -	WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
>> -}
>> -
>>  /*
>>   * Called when a domain is removed in detach. It is possible that
>>   * the removed domain decided the iova aperture window. Modify the
>> @@ -2366,10 +2350,10 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
>>  			kfree(group);
>>  
>>  			if (list_empty(&iommu->external_domain->group_list)) {
>> -				vfio_sanity_check_pfn_list(iommu);
>> -
>> -				if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
>> +				if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
>> +					WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
>>  					vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
>> +				}
>>  
>>  				kfree(iommu->external_domain);
>>  				iommu->external_domain = NULL;
>> @@ -2403,10 +2387,12 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
>>  		 */
>>  		if (list_empty(&domain->group_list)) {
>>  			if (list_is_singular(&iommu->domain_list)) {
>> -				if (!iommu->external_domain)
>> +				if (!iommu->external_domain) {
>> +					WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
>>  					vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
>> -				else
>> +				} else {
>>  					vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(iommu);
>> +				}
>>  			}
>>  			iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
>>  			list_del(&domain->next);
>> @@ -2488,9 +2474,10 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_release(void *iommu_data)
>>  	struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
>>  	struct vfio_domain *domain, *domain_tmp;
>>  
>> +	WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
> 
> I don't see that this does any harm, but isn't it actually redundant?
> It seems vfio-core only calls the iommu backend release function after
> removing all the groups, so the tests in _detach_group should catch all
> cases.  We're expecting the vfio bus/mdev driver to remove the notifier
> when a device is closed, which necessarily occurs before detaching the
> group.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
Hi Alex,

Sorry that today I was busy at sending the smmu HTTU based dma dirty log tracking.
I will reply you tomorrow. Thanks!

Keqian.

> 
>> +
>>  	if (iommu->external_domain) {
>>  		vfio_release_domain(iommu->external_domain, true);
>> -		vfio_sanity_check_pfn_list(iommu);
>>  		kfree(iommu->external_domain);
>>  	}
>>  
> 
> .
>