[v7,4/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add INTx support
Jianjun Wang
jianjun.wang at mediatek.com
Wed Jan 27 08:09:14 EST 2021
On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 12:25 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2021-01-13 11:39, Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > Add INTx support for MediaTek Gen3 PCIe controller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang at mediatek.com>
> > Acked-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 163 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > index c00ea7c167de..7979a2856c35 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > @@ -49,6 +52,12 @@
> > #define PCIE_LINK_STATUS_REG 0x154
> > #define PCIE_PORT_LINKUP BIT(8)
> >
> > +#define PCIE_INT_ENABLE_REG 0x180
> > +#define PCIE_INTX_SHIFT 24
> > +#define PCIE_INTX_MASK GENMASK(27, 24)
>
> I guess this '24' is actually PCIE_INTX_SHIFT? In this case,
> please write it as
>
> GENMASK(PCIE_INTX_SHIFT + PCI_NUM_INTX - 1, PCIE_INTX_SHIFT)
>
> to make it clear that you are dealing with one bit per INTx.
Yes, I will fix it in the next version, thanks for your review.
>
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_INT_STATUS_REG 0x184
> > +
> > #define PCIE_TRANS_TABLE_BASE_REG 0x800
> > #define PCIE_ATR_SRC_ADDR_MSB_OFFSET 0x4
> > #define PCIE_ATR_TRSL_ADDR_LSB_OFFSET 0x8
> > @@ -77,6 +86,8 @@
> > * @phy: PHY controller block
> > * @clks: PCIe clocks
> > * @num_clks: PCIe clocks count for this port
> > + * @irq: PCIe controller interrupt number
> > + * @intx_domain: legacy INTx IRQ domain
> > */
> > struct mtk_pcie_port {
> > struct device *dev;
> > @@ -87,6 +98,9 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port {
> > struct phy *phy;
> > struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> > int num_clks;
> > +
> > + int irq;
> > + struct irq_domain *intx_domain;
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -266,6 +280,149 @@ static int mtk_pcie_startup_port(struct
> > mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int mtk_pcie_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
> > + const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> > +{
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mtk_intx_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_INT_ENABLE_REG);
> > + val &= ~BIT(data->hwirq + PCIE_INTX_SHIFT);
> > + writel_relaxed(val, port->base + PCIE_INT_ENABLE_REG);
>
> This is missing some locking. Otherwise, two concurrent mask/unmask
> for different interrupts will corrupt each other's state.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mtk_intx_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_INT_ENABLE_REG);
> > + val |= BIT(data->hwirq + PCIE_INTX_SHIFT);
> > + writel_relaxed(val, port->base + PCIE_INT_ENABLE_REG);
>
> Same thing here.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * mtk_intx_eoi
> > + * @data: pointer to chip specific data
> > + *
> > + * As an emulated level IRQ, its interrupt status will remain
> > + * until the corresponding de-assert message is received; hence that
> > + * the status can only be cleared when the interrupt has been
> > serviced.
> > + */
> > +static void mtk_intx_eoi(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > + unsigned long hwirq;
> > +
> > + hwirq = data->hwirq + PCIE_INTX_SHIFT;
> > + writel_relaxed(BIT(hwirq), port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS_REG);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct irq_chip mtk_intx_irq_chip = {
> > + .irq_mask = mtk_intx_mask,
> > + .irq_unmask = mtk_intx_unmask,
> > + .irq_eoi = mtk_intx_eoi,
> > + .irq_set_affinity = mtk_pcie_set_affinity,
> > + .name = "PCIe",
>
> nit: "PCIe" is not really descriptive. "INTx" would be a bit better.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int mtk_pcie_intx_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int
> > irq,
> > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > +{
> > + irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &mtk_intx_irq_chip,
> > + handle_fasteoi_irq, "INTx");
> > + irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
>
> You probably want to set the chip_data *before* wiring
> the handler, as otherwise you could end-up with a NULL
> pointer in any of the callbacks if the interrupt fires
> between the two.
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct irq_domain_ops intx_domain_ops = {
> > + .map = mtk_pcie_intx_map,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct mtk_pcie_port *port,
> > + struct device_node *node)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = port->dev;
> > + struct device_node *intc_node;
> > +
> > + /* Setup INTx */
> > + intc_node = of_get_child_by_name(node, "interrupt-controller");
> > + if (!intc_node) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "missing PCIe Intc node\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + port->intx_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX,
> > + &intx_domain_ops, port);
> > + if (!port->intx_domain) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get INTx IRQ domain\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mtk_pcie_irq_teardown(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > +{
> > + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(port->irq, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (port->intx_domain)
> > + irq_domain_remove(port->intx_domain);
> > +
> > + irq_dispose_mapping(port->irq);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mtk_pcie_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie_port *port = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > + struct irq_chip *irqchip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> > + unsigned long status;
> > + unsigned int virq;
> > + irq_hw_number_t irq_bit = PCIE_INTX_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + chained_irq_enter(irqchip, desc);
> > +
> > + status = readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS_REG);
> > + if (status & PCIE_INTX_MASK) {
>
> This "if (status & PCIE_INTX_MASK)" is already implicit from
> the for_each_set_bit_from() iterator, and you can drop it.
>
> > + for_each_set_bit_from(irq_bit, &status, PCI_NUM_INTX +
> > + PCIE_INTX_SHIFT) {
> > + virq = irq_find_mapping(port->intx_domain,
> > + irq_bit - PCIE_INTX_SHIFT);
> > + generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + chained_irq_exit(irqchip, desc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mtk_pcie_setup_irq(struct mtk_pcie_port *port,
> > + struct device_node *node)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = port->dev;
> > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains(port, node);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to init PCIe IRQ domain\n");
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + port->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (port->irq < 0)
> > + return port->irq;
> > +
> > + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(port->irq, mtk_pcie_irq_handler,
> > port);
>
> You seem to be missing something that will mask all INTx interrupts
> as an initial state.
Yes, the INTx default state of this chip is disabled, but there are
still risks for driver use, I will add mask all INTx interrupts to
mtk_pcie_startup_port function in the next version.
Thanks.
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int mtk_pcie_clk_init(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > @@ -388,6 +545,10 @@ static int mtk_pcie_setup(struct mtk_pcie_port
> > *port)
> > goto err_setup;
> > }
> >
> > + err = mtk_pcie_setup_irq(port, dev->of_node);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_setup;
> > +
> > dev_info(dev, "PCIe link up success!\n");
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -423,6 +584,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > err = pci_host_probe(host);
> > if (err) {
> > + mtk_pcie_irq_teardown(port);
> > mtk_pcie_power_down(port);
> > return err;
> > }
> > @@ -440,6 +602,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > pci_remove_root_bus(host->bus);
> > pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> >
> > + mtk_pcie_irq_teardown(port);
> > mtk_pcie_power_down(port);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list