[PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for AM642 SoC

[Nishanth Menon]

On 13:57-20210121, Suman Anna wrote:
> This is all moot when your own tree doesn't boot properly. In this case, you are
> adding MMC nodes, but yet for a boot test, you are saying use linux-next for the
> nodes that were added or you need additional driver patches (which is not how
> maintainer-level trees are verified).

Get your facts straight please.

What do you mean does'nt boot? It does boot with initramfs which is
the minimum qual i had set for any new platform (along with. - your
need is for a device node to work - which is both a combination of
defconfig + driver updates.

> 
> Arnd,
> Can you please guide us here as to what is expected in general, given that the
> pull-request from Nishanth goes through you, and if there is some pre-existing
> norms around this?
> 
> Tony,
> Appreciate your input as well since you probably have dealt with these kinda of
> dependencies on OMAP.


I am more than happy to drop this entire SoC off my queue (I am yet to
pick it up), which is probably what I will do.


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D