[PATCH v6] drm/sun4i: tcon: fix inverted DCLK polarity
Maxime Ripard
maxime at cerno.tech
Thu Jan 14 06:42:19 EST 2021
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:17:32AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti at micronovasrl.com>
>
> During commit 88bc4178568b ("drm: Use new
> DRM_BUS_FLAG_*_(DRIVE|SAMPLE)_(POS|NEG)EDGE flags") DRM_BUS_FLAG_*
> macros have been changed to avoid ambiguity but just because of this
> ambiguity previous DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_(POS/NEG)EDGE were used meaning
> _SAMPLE_ not _DRIVE_. This leads to DLCK inversion and need to fix but
> instead of swapping phase values, let's adopt an easier approach Maxime
> suggested:
> It turned out that bit 26 of SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_REG is dedicated to
> invert DCLK polarity and this makes things really easier than before. So
> let's handle DCLK polarity by adding SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_DRIVE_NEGEDGE
> as bit 26 and activating according to bus_flags the same way it is done
> for all the other signals polarity.
>
> Fixes: 88bc4178568b ("drm: Use new DRM_BUS_FLAG_*_(DRIVE|SAMPLE)_(POS|NEG)EDGE flags")
> Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime at cerno.tech>
> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti at micronovasrl.com>
> ---
> V2->V3:
> - squash 2 patches into 1
> V3->V4:
> - add SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_POSITIVE to regmap_update_bits() as suggested by Maxime
> V4->V5:
> polarity is still wrong so:
> - let's use SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_DRIVE_NEGEDGE macro
> instead of _DCLK_POSITIVE(that would make sense only in realtion with DCLK)
> - invert condition using _NEGEDGE instead of _POSEDGE and then matching with
> register bit SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_DRIVE_NEGEDGE
> - correct commit log according to V4->V5 changes
> V5->V6:
> - fix typo in SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_DRIVE_NEGEDGE as suggested by Marjan
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 21 ++-------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> index eaaf5d70e352..6b9af4c08cd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> @@ -569,30 +569,13 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_rgb(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> if (info->bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_LOW)
> val |= SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DE_NEGATIVE;
>
> - /*
> - * On A20 and similar SoCs, the only way to achieve Positive Edge
> - * (Rising Edge), is setting dclk clock phase to 2/3(240°).
> - * By default TCON works in Negative Edge(Falling Edge),
> - * this is why phase is set to 0 in that case.
> - * Unfortunately there's no way to logically invert dclk through
> - * IO_POL register.
> - * The only acceptable way to work, triple checked with scope,
> - * is using clock phase set to 0° for Negative Edge and set to 240°
> - * for Positive Edge.
> - * On A33 and similar SoCs there would be a 90° phase option,
> - * but it divides also dclk by 2.
> - * Following code is a way to avoid quirks all around TCON
> - * and DOTCLOCK drivers.
> - */
> - if (info->bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_DRIVE_POSEDGE)
> - clk_set_phase(tcon->dclk, 240);
> -
> if (info->bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_DRIVE_NEGEDGE)
> - clk_set_phase(tcon->dclk, 0);
> + val |= SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_DRIVE_NEGEDGE;
>
> regmap_update_bits(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_REG,
> SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_HSYNC_POSITIVE |
> SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_VSYNC_POSITIVE |
> + SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_DRIVE_NEGEDGE |
> SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DE_NEGATIVE,
> val);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
> index cfbf4e6c1679..c5ac1b02482c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@
> #define SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_REG 0x88
> #define SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_PHASE(phase) ((phase & 3) << 28)
> #define SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DE_NEGATIVE BIT(27)
> +#define SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_DRIVE_NEGEDGE BIT(26)
> #define SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_HSYNC_POSITIVE BIT(25)
> #define SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_VSYNC_POSITIVE BIT(24)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Applied, thanks!
Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20210114/ec3e80ad/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list