[PATCH v17 08/10] PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users
dan.j.williams at intel.com
Mon Feb 22 14:17:46 EST 2021
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 2:24 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:34:52AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:49:18AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > It is unsafe to allow saving of secretmem areas to the hibernation
> > > snapshot as they would be visible after the resume and this essentially
> > > will defeat the purpose of secret memory mappings.
> > Sorry for being a bit late to this - from the point of view of running
> > processes (and even the kernel once resume is complete), hibernation is
> > effectively equivalent to suspend to RAM. Why do they need to be handled
> > differently here?
> Hibernation leaves a copy of the data on the disk which we want to prevent.
Why not document that users should use data at rest protection
mechanisms for their hibernation device? Just because secretmem can't
assert its disclosure guarantee does not mean the hibernation device
More information about the linux-arm-kernel