[PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock
lee.jones at linaro.org
Thu Feb 18 04:31:08 EST 2021
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:20:46 +0000 Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:49:52 +0000 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > Yes, please share.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa
> > Thanks for this.
> > Oh, I see. So you conduct tests locally, then post them up in a
> > section called 'Checks' using the provided API.
> For some definition of "locally" - NIPA runs on a rented VM.
Right. Infrastructure that you control vs by Patchwork.
> > I assume that Patchwork does not alert the user when something has
> > gone awry? Is this something Nipa does?
> The way we run it on netdev is maintainer-centric, IOW we see
> the failures in patchwork and complain to people manually.
> The netdev mailing list gets too many messages as is, if NIPA
> responded with results automatically (which is not that hard
> technically) my concern is that people would be more likely to
> send untested patches to the mailing list and rely on the bot.
That makes sense. Thank you for the explanation.
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel