[PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock
Lee Jones
lee.jones at linaro.org
Mon Feb 15 03:49:52 EST 2021
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:00:42PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Andrew Lunn (2021-02-13 08:04:34)
> > > > I'm trying to see if we can make lives better for everyone by exposing
> > > > the warnings by default in the drivers/clk/ directory now that there are
> > > > supposedly none left. Shouldn't we tighten the screws now that we've
> > > > cleaned them?
> > >
> > > Do you use patchwork? netdev has a bot attached which applies the
> > > patch and does a W=1 build, and will report any new warnings. But it
> > > does not email the developer, as far as i know. It is up to you as the
> > > maintainer to reject the patch and say why.
> > >
> >
> > Yes the kernel.org patchwork instance is used but I don't see any bot
> > putting test results there. How is that done?
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/list/
>
> Compare this with for example:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210213175257.28642-1-ap420073@gmail.com/
Oh, that's nice.
> Jakub can explain how he added these checks.
Yes, please share.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list