[RFC/PATCH v2 02/16] dt-bindings: soc: bcm: bcm2835-pm: Introduce reg-names

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 01:58:58PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Anticipating the introduction of BCM2711, of which we'll need to support
> its new Argon ASB, introduce reg-names into bcm2835-pm's binding. This
> will help to have a consistent mapping between resources and their
> meaning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne at suse.de>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm/brcm,bcm2835-pm.yaml  | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm/brcm,bcm2835-pm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm/brcm,bcm2835-pm.yaml
> index 8bc65e5f62a7..1dbe3657c690 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm/brcm,bcm2835-pm.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm/brcm,bcm2835-pm.yaml
> @@ -26,8 +26,13 @@ properties:
>    reg:
>      minItems: 1
>      maxItems: 2
> -    description: Specifies base physical address and size of the two register
> -                 ranges, "PM" and "ASYNC_BRIDGE" in that order.

Ah, it's okay this way if you have -names. Or have items to give a bit 
more detail.

> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +    items:
> +      - const: pm
> +      - const: rpivid_asb

Not really clear how this corresponds to 'ASYNC_BRIDGE'. 'asb' I guess?

>  
>    "#power-domain-cells":
>      const: 1
> @@ -54,6 +59,7 @@ properties:
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> +  - reg-names

You can't really make added properties required.

>    - "#power-domain-cells"
>    - "#reset-cells"
>    - clocks
> @@ -70,6 +76,7 @@ examples:
>          #reset-cells = <1>;
>          reg = <0x7e100000 0x114>,
>                <0x7e00a000 0x24>;
> +        reg-names = "pm", "rpivid_asb";
>          clocks = <&clocks BCM2835_CLOCK_V3D>,
>          	 <&clocks BCM2835_CLOCK_PERI_IMAGE>,
>          	 <&clocks BCM2835_CLOCK_H264>,
> -- 
> 2.30.0
>